Cargando…

Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES: The use of biologic agents has revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the past 2 decades. These biologic agents directly target molecules and cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA. The purpose of this study was to assess the usage of biologic agents in terms of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sangiorgi, Diego, Benucci, Maurizio, Nappi, Carmela, Perrone, Valentina, Buda, Stefano, Degli Esposti, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S89286
_version_ 1782400425613328384
author Sangiorgi, Diego
Benucci, Maurizio
Nappi, Carmela
Perrone, Valentina
Buda, Stefano
Degli Esposti, Luca
author_facet Sangiorgi, Diego
Benucci, Maurizio
Nappi, Carmela
Perrone, Valentina
Buda, Stefano
Degli Esposti, Luca
author_sort Sangiorgi, Diego
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The use of biologic agents has revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the past 2 decades. These biologic agents directly target molecules and cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA. The purpose of this study was to assess the usage of biologic agents in terms of persistence to treatment, dose escalation, and consumption of health care resources (hospitalizations, drugs, and outpatients service) in the real clinical practice in naïve patients with RA. METHODS: We conducted a real-world, retrospective, observational cohort study based on data obtained from administrative databases of three Local Health Units in Italy. The population included adults diagnosed with RA who had at least one prescription between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011, for a biologic that was approved for treatment of RA. The patients were followed for 12 months after enrollment. The clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in this study were also investigated in the 1-year period before the index date. The main and secondary endpoints were evaluated only in biologic-naïve patients without switches. The overall health care costs for patients were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 594 patients met the study criteria (mean age 53.5±13.5, female:male ratio =3:1). Thirty-nine percent received etanercept, 25% adalimumab, 14% infliximab, 10% abatacept, 9% tocilizumab, and 3% golimumab. After 1 year of observation, patients showed similar use of other RA-related medication. For the naïve patients without switches, the persistence levels were: 78% for etanercept, 72% for tocilizumab, 71% for adalimumab, 69% for infliximab, and 64% for abatacept. For all agents, dose escalation was 21.4% for infliximab, 11.5% for adalimumab, 5.6% for abatacept, 4% for tocilizumab, and 3.8% for etanercept. The annual costs per treated patients were €12,803 for adalimumab, €11,924 for etanercept, €11,830 for tocilizumab, €11,201 for infliximab, and €10,943 for abatacept. CONCLUSION: The role of biologic therapies in the treatment of RA continues to evolve; our study reflects real-world drug utilization data in adult patients with RA. These observations could be used by decision makers to support formulary decisions, although further research is needed using a larger sample to validate these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46428032015-11-24 Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis Sangiorgi, Diego Benucci, Maurizio Nappi, Carmela Perrone, Valentina Buda, Stefano Degli Esposti, Luca Biologics Original Research OBJECTIVES: The use of biologic agents has revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the past 2 decades. These biologic agents directly target molecules and cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA. The purpose of this study was to assess the usage of biologic agents in terms of persistence to treatment, dose escalation, and consumption of health care resources (hospitalizations, drugs, and outpatients service) in the real clinical practice in naïve patients with RA. METHODS: We conducted a real-world, retrospective, observational cohort study based on data obtained from administrative databases of three Local Health Units in Italy. The population included adults diagnosed with RA who had at least one prescription between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011, for a biologic that was approved for treatment of RA. The patients were followed for 12 months after enrollment. The clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in this study were also investigated in the 1-year period before the index date. The main and secondary endpoints were evaluated only in biologic-naïve patients without switches. The overall health care costs for patients were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 594 patients met the study criteria (mean age 53.5±13.5, female:male ratio =3:1). Thirty-nine percent received etanercept, 25% adalimumab, 14% infliximab, 10% abatacept, 9% tocilizumab, and 3% golimumab. After 1 year of observation, patients showed similar use of other RA-related medication. For the naïve patients without switches, the persistence levels were: 78% for etanercept, 72% for tocilizumab, 71% for adalimumab, 69% for infliximab, and 64% for abatacept. For all agents, dose escalation was 21.4% for infliximab, 11.5% for adalimumab, 5.6% for abatacept, 4% for tocilizumab, and 3.8% for etanercept. The annual costs per treated patients were €12,803 for adalimumab, €11,924 for etanercept, €11,830 for tocilizumab, €11,201 for infliximab, and €10,943 for abatacept. CONCLUSION: The role of biologic therapies in the treatment of RA continues to evolve; our study reflects real-world drug utilization data in adult patients with RA. These observations could be used by decision makers to support formulary decisions, although further research is needed using a larger sample to validate these results. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4642803/ /pubmed/26604680 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S89286 Text en © 2015 Sangiorgi et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sangiorgi, Diego
Benucci, Maurizio
Nappi, Carmela
Perrone, Valentina
Buda, Stefano
Degli Esposti, Luca
Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S89286
work_keys_str_mv AT sangiorgidiego drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT benuccimaurizio drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT nappicarmela drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT perronevalentina drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT budastefano drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT degliespostiluca drugusageanalysisandhealthcareresourcesconsumptioninnaivepatientswithrheumatoidarthritis