Cargando…

Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach

Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svobodová, Iveta, Pazourková, Eva, Hořínek, Aleš, Novotná, Michaela, Calda, Pavel, Korabečná, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572
_version_ 1782400436983037952
author Svobodová, Iveta
Pazourková, Eva
Hořínek, Aleš
Novotná, Michaela
Calda, Pavel
Korabečná, Marie
author_facet Svobodová, Iveta
Pazourková, Eva
Hořínek, Aleš
Novotná, Michaela
Calda, Pavel
Korabečná, Marie
author_sort Svobodová, Iveta
collection PubMed
description Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods’ performance parameters—standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision—were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4642940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46429402015-11-18 Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach Svobodová, Iveta Pazourková, Eva Hořínek, Aleš Novotná, Michaela Calda, Pavel Korabečná, Marie PLoS One Research Article Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods’ performance parameters—standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision—were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438). Public Library of Science 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4642940/ /pubmed/26562517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572 Text en © 2015 Svobodová et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Svobodová, Iveta
Pazourková, Eva
Hořínek, Aleš
Novotná, Michaela
Calda, Pavel
Korabečná, Marie
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title_full Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title_fullStr Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title_short Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
title_sort performance of droplet digital pcr in non-invasive fetal rhd genotyping - comparison with a routine real-time pcr based approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572
work_keys_str_mv AT svobodovaiveta performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT pazourkovaeva performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT horinekales performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT novotnamichaela performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT caldapavel performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT korabecnamarie performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach