Cargando…
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach
Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572 |
_version_ | 1782400436983037952 |
---|---|
author | Svobodová, Iveta Pazourková, Eva Hořínek, Aleš Novotná, Michaela Calda, Pavel Korabečná, Marie |
author_facet | Svobodová, Iveta Pazourková, Eva Hořínek, Aleš Novotná, Michaela Calda, Pavel Korabečná, Marie |
author_sort | Svobodová, Iveta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods’ performance parameters—standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision—were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4642940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46429402015-11-18 Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach Svobodová, Iveta Pazourková, Eva Hořínek, Aleš Novotná, Michaela Calda, Pavel Korabečná, Marie PLoS One Research Article Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods’ performance parameters—standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision—were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438). Public Library of Science 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4642940/ /pubmed/26562517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572 Text en © 2015 Svobodová et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Svobodová, Iveta Pazourková, Eva Hořínek, Aleš Novotná, Michaela Calda, Pavel Korabečná, Marie Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title | Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title_full | Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title_fullStr | Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title_short | Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach |
title_sort | performance of droplet digital pcr in non-invasive fetal rhd genotyping - comparison with a routine real-time pcr based approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4642940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svobodovaiveta performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT pazourkovaeva performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT horinekales performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT novotnamichaela performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT caldapavel performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT korabecnamarie performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach |