Cargando…

A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya

Contrary to the perception of many researchers that the recent invasion of chikungunya (CHIK) in the Western Hemisphere marked the first episode in history, a recent publication reminded them that CHIK had prevailed in the West Indies and southern regions of the United States from 1827–1828 under th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kuno, Goro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004101
_version_ 1782400459482333184
author Kuno, Goro
author_facet Kuno, Goro
author_sort Kuno, Goro
collection PubMed
description Contrary to the perception of many researchers that the recent invasion of chikungunya (CHIK) in the Western Hemisphere marked the first episode in history, a recent publication reminded them that CHIK had prevailed in the West Indies and southern regions of the United States from 1827–1828 under the guise of “dengue” (DEN), and that many old outbreaks of so-called “dengue” actually represented the CHIK cases erroneously identified as “dengue.” In hindsight, this confusion was unavoidable, given that the syndromes of the two diseases—transmitted by the same mosquito vector in urban areas—are very similar, and that specific laboratory-based diagnostic techniques for these diseases did not exist prior to 1940. While past reviewers reclassified problematic “dengue” outbreaks as CHIK, primarily based on manifestation of arthralgia as a marker of CHIK, they neither identified the root cause of the alleged misdiagnosis nor did they elaborate on the negative consequences derived from it. This article presents a reconstructed history of the genesis of the clinical definition of dengue by emphasizing problems with the definition, subsequent confusion with CHIK, and the ways in which physicians dealt with the variation in dengue-like (“dengue”) syndromes. Then, the article identifies in those records several factors complicating reclassification, based on current practice and standards. These factors include terms used for characterizing joint problems, style of documenting outbreak data, frequency of manifestation of arthralgia, possible involvement of more than one agent, and occurrence of the principal vector. The analysis of those factors reveals that while some of the old “dengue” outbreaks, including the 1827–1828 outbreaks in the Americas, are compatible with CHIK, similar reclassification of other “dengue” outbreaks to CHIK is difficult because of a combination of the absence of pathognomonic syndrome in these diseases and conflicting background information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4643049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46430492015-11-18 A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya Kuno, Goro PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review Contrary to the perception of many researchers that the recent invasion of chikungunya (CHIK) in the Western Hemisphere marked the first episode in history, a recent publication reminded them that CHIK had prevailed in the West Indies and southern regions of the United States from 1827–1828 under the guise of “dengue” (DEN), and that many old outbreaks of so-called “dengue” actually represented the CHIK cases erroneously identified as “dengue.” In hindsight, this confusion was unavoidable, given that the syndromes of the two diseases—transmitted by the same mosquito vector in urban areas—are very similar, and that specific laboratory-based diagnostic techniques for these diseases did not exist prior to 1940. While past reviewers reclassified problematic “dengue” outbreaks as CHIK, primarily based on manifestation of arthralgia as a marker of CHIK, they neither identified the root cause of the alleged misdiagnosis nor did they elaborate on the negative consequences derived from it. This article presents a reconstructed history of the genesis of the clinical definition of dengue by emphasizing problems with the definition, subsequent confusion with CHIK, and the ways in which physicians dealt with the variation in dengue-like (“dengue”) syndromes. Then, the article identifies in those records several factors complicating reclassification, based on current practice and standards. These factors include terms used for characterizing joint problems, style of documenting outbreak data, frequency of manifestation of arthralgia, possible involvement of more than one agent, and occurrence of the principal vector. The analysis of those factors reveals that while some of the old “dengue” outbreaks, including the 1827–1828 outbreaks in the Americas, are compatible with CHIK, similar reclassification of other “dengue” outbreaks to CHIK is difficult because of a combination of the absence of pathognomonic syndrome in these diseases and conflicting background information. Public Library of Science 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4643049/ /pubmed/26562299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004101 Text en © 2015 Goro Kuno http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Kuno, Goro
A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title_full A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title_fullStr A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title_full_unstemmed A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title_short A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
title_sort re-examination of the history of etiologic confusion between dengue and chikungunya
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004101
work_keys_str_mv AT kunogoro areexaminationofthehistoryofetiologicconfusionbetweendengueandchikungunya
AT kunogoro reexaminationofthehistoryofetiologicconfusionbetweendengueandchikungunya