Cargando…

Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module

PURPOSE: We previously described a new procedure specific module (Tube 3) to allow the practice of vesicourethral anastomosis after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Herein, we report a predetermined proficiency level of Tube 3 and preliminary validation to explore whether this new module can le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Yoon, Kim, Seung Bin, Pyun, Jong Hyun, Kim, Hyung Keun, Cho, Seok, Lee, Jeong Gu, Kim, Je Jong, Cheon, Jun, Kang, Seok Ho, Kang, Sung Gu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.756
_version_ 1782400482841460736
author Kim, Jae Yoon
Kim, Seung Bin
Pyun, Jong Hyun
Kim, Hyung Keun
Cho, Seok
Lee, Jeong Gu
Kim, Je Jong
Cheon, Jun
Kang, Seok Ho
Kang, Sung Gu
author_facet Kim, Jae Yoon
Kim, Seung Bin
Pyun, Jong Hyun
Kim, Hyung Keun
Cho, Seok
Lee, Jeong Gu
Kim, Je Jong
Cheon, Jun
Kang, Seok Ho
Kang, Sung Gu
author_sort Kim, Jae Yoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We previously described a new procedure specific module (Tube 3) to allow the practice of vesicourethral anastomosis after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Herein, we report a predetermined proficiency level of Tube 3 and preliminary validation to explore whether this new module can lead to performance improvement in the da Vinci system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight urology residents and three urology fellows performed the Tube 3 module 1 hour daily for 7 days. The learning curve was depicted through a scatterplot and the stable point was identified through the cumulative sum chart. Concurrent and predictive validations were performed with the da Vinci system. The mean time to complete the task and end product rating score between Tube 3 training group and no Tube 3 training group were compared. RESULTS: Concerning the learning curve, about 41 repetitions comprising about 5 hours were needed to achieve this stable point when the mean time to complete Tube of 384 seconds was set as a target. With regarding to the concurrent and predictive validation, there significant differences were evident in the mean time to complete 16 needle passages and the vesicourethral anastomosis and the end product rating score. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual reality (VR) simulator can yield sufficient improvement in technical performance in Tube 3 within 5 hours. The acquired proficiency can be transferable to the vesicourethral anastomosis using the da Vinci system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4643171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46431712015-11-14 Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module Kim, Jae Yoon Kim, Seung Bin Pyun, Jong Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Cho, Seok Lee, Jeong Gu Kim, Je Jong Cheon, Jun Kang, Seok Ho Kang, Sung Gu Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: We previously described a new procedure specific module (Tube 3) to allow the practice of vesicourethral anastomosis after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Herein, we report a predetermined proficiency level of Tube 3 and preliminary validation to explore whether this new module can lead to performance improvement in the da Vinci system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight urology residents and three urology fellows performed the Tube 3 module 1 hour daily for 7 days. The learning curve was depicted through a scatterplot and the stable point was identified through the cumulative sum chart. Concurrent and predictive validations were performed with the da Vinci system. The mean time to complete the task and end product rating score between Tube 3 training group and no Tube 3 training group were compared. RESULTS: Concerning the learning curve, about 41 repetitions comprising about 5 hours were needed to achieve this stable point when the mean time to complete Tube of 384 seconds was set as a target. With regarding to the concurrent and predictive validation, there significant differences were evident in the mean time to complete 16 needle passages and the vesicourethral anastomosis and the end product rating score. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual reality (VR) simulator can yield sufficient improvement in technical performance in Tube 3 within 5 hours. The acquired proficiency can be transferable to the vesicourethral anastomosis using the da Vinci system. The Korean Urological Association 2015-11 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4643171/ /pubmed/26568793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.756 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jae Yoon
Kim, Seung Bin
Pyun, Jong Hyun
Kim, Hyung Keun
Cho, Seok
Lee, Jeong Gu
Kim, Je Jong
Cheon, Jun
Kang, Seok Ho
Kang, Sung Gu
Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title_full Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title_fullStr Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title_short Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module
title_sort concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator tube 3 module
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.756
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaeyoon concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT kimseungbin concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT pyunjonghyun concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT kimhyungkeun concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT choseok concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT leejeonggu concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT kimjejong concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT cheonjun concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT kangseokho concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module
AT kangsunggu concurrentandpredictivevalidationofroboticsimulatortube3module