Cargando…

Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Fluid administration to critically ill patients remains the subject of considerable controversy. While intravenous fluid given for resuscitation may be life-saving, a positive fluid balance over time is associated with worse outcomes in critical illness. The aim of this systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silversides, Jonathan A., Ferguson, Andrew J., McAuley, Daniel F., Blackwood, Bronagh, Marshall, John C., Fan, Eddy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26563763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0150-z
_version_ 1782400522757603328
author Silversides, Jonathan A.
Ferguson, Andrew J.
McAuley, Daniel F.
Blackwood, Bronagh
Marshall, John C.
Fan, Eddy
author_facet Silversides, Jonathan A.
Ferguson, Andrew J.
McAuley, Daniel F.
Blackwood, Bronagh
Marshall, John C.
Fan, Eddy
author_sort Silversides, Jonathan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fluid administration to critically ill patients remains the subject of considerable controversy. While intravenous fluid given for resuscitation may be life-saving, a positive fluid balance over time is associated with worse outcomes in critical illness. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the existing evidence regarding the relationship between fluid administration or balance and clinically important patient outcomes in critical illness. METHODS: We will search Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1980 to the present and key conference proceedings from 2009 to the present. We will include studies of critically ill adults and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We will include randomised controlled trials comparing two or more fluid regimens of different volumes of fluid and observational studies reporting the relationship between volume of fluid administered or fluid balance and outcomes including mortality, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay and organ dysfunction. Two independent reviewers will assess articles for eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal. We will conduct a narrative and/or meta-analysis as appropriate. DISCUSSION: While fluid management has been extensively studied and discussed in the critical care literature, no systematic review has attempted to summarise the evidence for post-resuscitation fluid strategies in critical illness. Results of the proposed systematic review will inform practice and the design of future clinical trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005608. (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0150-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4643493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46434932015-11-14 Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Silversides, Jonathan A. Ferguson, Andrew J. McAuley, Daniel F. Blackwood, Bronagh Marshall, John C. Fan, Eddy Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Fluid administration to critically ill patients remains the subject of considerable controversy. While intravenous fluid given for resuscitation may be life-saving, a positive fluid balance over time is associated with worse outcomes in critical illness. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the existing evidence regarding the relationship between fluid administration or balance and clinically important patient outcomes in critical illness. METHODS: We will search Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1980 to the present and key conference proceedings from 2009 to the present. We will include studies of critically ill adults and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We will include randomised controlled trials comparing two or more fluid regimens of different volumes of fluid and observational studies reporting the relationship between volume of fluid administered or fluid balance and outcomes including mortality, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay and organ dysfunction. Two independent reviewers will assess articles for eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal. We will conduct a narrative and/or meta-analysis as appropriate. DISCUSSION: While fluid management has been extensively studied and discussed in the critical care literature, no systematic review has attempted to summarise the evidence for post-resuscitation fluid strategies in critical illness. Results of the proposed systematic review will inform practice and the design of future clinical trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005608. (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0150-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4643493/ /pubmed/26563763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0150-z Text en © Silversides et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Silversides, Jonathan A.
Ferguson, Andrew J.
McAuley, Daniel F.
Blackwood, Bronagh
Marshall, John C.
Fan, Eddy
Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26563763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0150-z
work_keys_str_mv AT silversidesjonathana fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fergusonandrewj fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcauleydanielf fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blackwoodbronagh fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marshalljohnc fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT faneddy fluidstrategiesandoutcomesinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystemicinflammatoryresponsesyndromeandsepsisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis