Cargando…

Urolastic for the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and durability of Urolastic, a new urethral bulking agent in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), after a follow-up of 24-months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A follow-up study of women with SUI who received a Urolastic injection and successfully passed the 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zajda, Janusz, Farag, Fawzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568877
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.541
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and durability of Urolastic, a new urethral bulking agent in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), after a follow-up of 24-months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A follow-up study of women with SUI who received a Urolastic injection and successfully passed the 12-month follow-up. Assessment included the Stamey Grade, 1-h Pad weight test, and the International quality of life (I-QoL) score. RESULTS: Nineteen women who completed the 12-month follow-up were invited for the 24-month follow-up study. One patient did not respond to the correspondence. Four of the 18 patients who responded to the correspondence reported removal of the Urolastic implant at another facility, based on their desire. The explanation for this removal was painful intercourse (n = 1) or less than optimal dryness (n = 3). The overall objective improvement in continence status at 24-months was 66% compared to the 89% at the 12-month follow-up, while in addition the 1-h pad weight test showed >50% reduction in pad weight in 66% of patients compared to 84% at the 12-month follow-up. Adverse events reported were urinary tract infection (n = 1), local genital infection with erosion into the vagina (n = 1), painful intercourse (n = 2), and urgency (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Urolastic is comparable to other bulking agents in terms of durability, efficacy, and complications.