Cargando…

Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

INTRODUCTION: To determine and evaluate the effective radiation exposure during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients following the SWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total Effective Radiation Exposure (ERE) doses for each of the 129 patients: 44 kid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaynar, Mehmet, Tekinarslan, Erdem, Keskin, Suat, Buldu, İbrahim, Sönmez, Mehmet Giray, Karatag, Tuna, Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568880
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.547
_version_ 1782400549201641472
author Kaynar, Mehmet
Tekinarslan, Erdem
Keskin, Suat
Buldu, İbrahim
Sönmez, Mehmet Giray
Karatag, Tuna
Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
author_facet Kaynar, Mehmet
Tekinarslan, Erdem
Keskin, Suat
Buldu, İbrahim
Sönmez, Mehmet Giray
Karatag, Tuna
Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
author_sort Kaynar, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To determine and evaluate the effective radiation exposure during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients following the SWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total Effective Radiation Exposure (ERE) doses for each of the 129 patients: 44 kidney stone patients, 41 ureter stone patients, and 44 multiple stone location patients were calculated by adding up the radiation doses of each ionizing radiation session including images (IVU, KUB, CT) throughout a one year follow-up period following the SWL. RESULTS: Total mean ERE values for the kidney stone group was calculated as 15, 91 mSv (5.10-27.60), for the ureter group as 13.32 mSv (5.10-24.70), and in the multiple stone location group as 27.02 mSv (9.41-54.85). There was no statistically significant differences between the kidney and ureter groups in terms of the ERE dose values (p = 0.221) (p >0.05). In the comparison of the kidney and ureter stone groups with the multiple stone location group; however, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000) (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ERE doses should be a factor to be considered right at the initiation of any diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure. Especially in the case of multiple stone locations, due to the high exposure to ionized radiation, different imaging modalities with low dose and/or totally without a dose should be employed in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up bearing the aim to optimize diagnosis while minimizing the radiation dose as much as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4643697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46436972015-11-13 Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Kaynar, Mehmet Tekinarslan, Erdem Keskin, Suat Buldu, İbrahim Sönmez, Mehmet Giray Karatag, Tuna Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To determine and evaluate the effective radiation exposure during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients following the SWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total Effective Radiation Exposure (ERE) doses for each of the 129 patients: 44 kidney stone patients, 41 ureter stone patients, and 44 multiple stone location patients were calculated by adding up the radiation doses of each ionizing radiation session including images (IVU, KUB, CT) throughout a one year follow-up period following the SWL. RESULTS: Total mean ERE values for the kidney stone group was calculated as 15, 91 mSv (5.10-27.60), for the ureter group as 13.32 mSv (5.10-24.70), and in the multiple stone location group as 27.02 mSv (9.41-54.85). There was no statistically significant differences between the kidney and ureter groups in terms of the ERE dose values (p = 0.221) (p >0.05). In the comparison of the kidney and ureter stone groups with the multiple stone location group; however, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000) (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ERE doses should be a factor to be considered right at the initiation of any diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure. Especially in the case of multiple stone locations, due to the high exposure to ionized radiation, different imaging modalities with low dose and/or totally without a dose should be employed in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up bearing the aim to optimize diagnosis while minimizing the radiation dose as much as possible. Polish Urological Association 2015-09-26 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4643697/ /pubmed/26568880 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.547 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kaynar, Mehmet
Tekinarslan, Erdem
Keskin, Suat
Buldu, İbrahim
Sönmez, Mehmet Giray
Karatag, Tuna
Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title_full Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title_fullStr Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title_full_unstemmed Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title_short Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
title_sort effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568880
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.547
work_keys_str_mv AT kaynarmehmet effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT tekinarslanerdem effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT keskinsuat effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT bulduibrahim effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT sonmezmehmetgiray effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT karatagtuna effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy
AT istanbulluoglumustafaokan effectiveradiationexposureevaluationduringaoneyearfollowupofurolithiasispatientsafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy