Cargando…

Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Death rates have been declining, largely as a result of early detection through mammography and improved treatment, but mammographic screening is controversial because of o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schummer, Michèl, Thorpe, Jason, Giraldez, Maria, Bergan, Lindsay, Tewari, Muneesh, Urban, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26565788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142911
_version_ 1782400581362515968
author Schummer, Michèl
Thorpe, Jason
Giraldez, Maria
Bergan, Lindsay
Tewari, Muneesh
Urban, Nicole
author_facet Schummer, Michèl
Thorpe, Jason
Giraldez, Maria
Bergan, Lindsay
Tewari, Muneesh
Urban, Nicole
author_sort Schummer, Michèl
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Death rates have been declining, largely as a result of early detection through mammography and improved treatment, but mammographic screening is controversial because of over-diagnosis of breast disease that might not require treatment, and under-diagnosis of cancer in women with dense breasts. Breast cancer screening could be improved by pairing mammography with a tumor circulating marker, of which there are currently none. Given genomic similarities between the basal breast cancer subtype and serous ovarian cancer, and given our success in identifying circulating markers for ovarian cancer, we investigated the performance in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer detection of both previously identified ovarian serum markers and circulating markers associated with transcripts that were differentially expressed in breast cancer tissue compared to healthy breast tissue from reduction mammaplasties. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 15 analytes (13 proteins, 1 miRNA, 1 autoantibody) in sera drawn at or before breast cancer surgery from 43 breast cancer cases (28 triple-negative—TN—and 15 hormone receptor-negative—HRN—/ HER2-positive) and 87 matched controls. RESULTS: In the analysis of our whole cohort of breast cancer cases, autoantibodies to TP53 performed significantly better than the other selected 14 analytes showing 25.6% and 34.9% sensitivity at 95% and 90% specificity respectively with AUC: 0.7 (p<0.001). The subset of 28 TN cancers showed very similar results. We observed no correlation between anti-TP53 and the 14 other markers; however, anti-TP53 expression correlated with Body-Mass-Index. It did not correlate with tumor size, positive lymph nodes, tumor stage, the presence of metastases or recurrence. CONCLUSION: None of the 13 serum proteins nor miRNA 135b identified women with HRN or TN breast cancer. TP53 autoantibodies identified women with HRN breast cancer and may have potential for early detection, confirming earlier reports. TP53 autoantibodies are long lasting in serum but may be affected by storage duration. Autoantibodies to TP53 might correlate with Body-Mass-Index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4643893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46438932015-11-18 Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer Schummer, Michèl Thorpe, Jason Giraldez, Maria Bergan, Lindsay Tewari, Muneesh Urban, Nicole PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Death rates have been declining, largely as a result of early detection through mammography and improved treatment, but mammographic screening is controversial because of over-diagnosis of breast disease that might not require treatment, and under-diagnosis of cancer in women with dense breasts. Breast cancer screening could be improved by pairing mammography with a tumor circulating marker, of which there are currently none. Given genomic similarities between the basal breast cancer subtype and serous ovarian cancer, and given our success in identifying circulating markers for ovarian cancer, we investigated the performance in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer detection of both previously identified ovarian serum markers and circulating markers associated with transcripts that were differentially expressed in breast cancer tissue compared to healthy breast tissue from reduction mammaplasties. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 15 analytes (13 proteins, 1 miRNA, 1 autoantibody) in sera drawn at or before breast cancer surgery from 43 breast cancer cases (28 triple-negative—TN—and 15 hormone receptor-negative—HRN—/ HER2-positive) and 87 matched controls. RESULTS: In the analysis of our whole cohort of breast cancer cases, autoantibodies to TP53 performed significantly better than the other selected 14 analytes showing 25.6% and 34.9% sensitivity at 95% and 90% specificity respectively with AUC: 0.7 (p<0.001). The subset of 28 TN cancers showed very similar results. We observed no correlation between anti-TP53 and the 14 other markers; however, anti-TP53 expression correlated with Body-Mass-Index. It did not correlate with tumor size, positive lymph nodes, tumor stage, the presence of metastases or recurrence. CONCLUSION: None of the 13 serum proteins nor miRNA 135b identified women with HRN or TN breast cancer. TP53 autoantibodies identified women with HRN breast cancer and may have potential for early detection, confirming earlier reports. TP53 autoantibodies are long lasting in serum but may be affected by storage duration. Autoantibodies to TP53 might correlate with Body-Mass-Index. Public Library of Science 2015-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4643893/ /pubmed/26565788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142911 Text en © 2015 Schummer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schummer, Michèl
Thorpe, Jason
Giraldez, Maria
Bergan, Lindsay
Tewari, Muneesh
Urban, Nicole
Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title_short Evaluating Serum Markers for Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
title_sort evaluating serum markers for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26565788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142911
work_keys_str_mv AT schummermichel evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer
AT thorpejason evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer
AT giraldezmaria evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer
AT berganlindsay evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer
AT tewarimuneesh evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer
AT urbannicole evaluatingserummarkersforhormonereceptornegativebreastcancer