Cargando…

Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients in the leave-without-being-seen (LWBS) group risk problems of inefficiency, medical risk, and financial loss. The goal at our hospital is to limit LWBS to <1%. This study’s goal was to assess the influence on LWBS associated with prolonging interva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pielsticker, Shea, Whelan, Lori, Arthur, Annette O., Thomas, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587080
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.25878
_version_ 1782400607435358208
author Pielsticker, Shea
Whelan, Lori
Arthur, Annette O.
Thomas, Stephen
author_facet Pielsticker, Shea
Whelan, Lori
Arthur, Annette O.
Thomas, Stephen
author_sort Pielsticker, Shea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients in the leave-without-being-seen (LWBS) group risk problems of inefficiency, medical risk, and financial loss. The goal at our hospital is to limit LWBS to <1%. This study’s goal was to assess the influence on LWBS associated with prolonging intervals between patient presentation and placement in an exam room (DoorRoom time). This study’s major aim was to identify DoorRoom cutoffs that maximize likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal (i.e. <1%). METHODS: We conducted the study over one year (8/13–8/14) using operations data for an ED with annual census ~50,000. For each study day, the LWBS endpoint (i.e. was LWBS <1%: “yes or no”) and the mean DoorRoom time were recorded. We categorized DoorRoom means by intervals starting with ≤10min and ending at >60min. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess for DoorRoom cutoffs predicting high LWBS, while adjusting for patient acuity (triage scores and admission %) and operations parameters. We used predictive marginal probability to assess utility of the regression-generated cutoffs. We defined statistical significance at p<0.05 and report odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Univariate results suggested a primary DoorRoom cutoff of 20′, to maintain a high likelihood (>85%) of meeting the LWBS goal. A secondary DoorRoom cutoff was indicated at 35′, to prevent a precipitous drop-off in likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal, from 61.1% at 35′ to 34.4% at 40′. Predictive marginal analysis using multivariate techniques to control for operational and patient-acuity factors confirmed the 20′ and 35′ cutoffs as significant (p<0.001). Days with DoorRoom between 21–35′ were 74% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom ≤20′ (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.13–0.53]). Days with DoorRoom >35′ were a further 75% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom of 21–35′ (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.15–0.41]). CONCLUSION: Operationally useful DoorRoom cutoffs can be identified, which allow for rational establishment of performance goals for the ED attempting to minimize LWBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4644024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46440242015-11-19 Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates Pielsticker, Shea Whelan, Lori Arthur, Annette O. Thomas, Stephen West J Emerg Med Emergency Department Operations INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients in the leave-without-being-seen (LWBS) group risk problems of inefficiency, medical risk, and financial loss. The goal at our hospital is to limit LWBS to <1%. This study’s goal was to assess the influence on LWBS associated with prolonging intervals between patient presentation and placement in an exam room (DoorRoom time). This study’s major aim was to identify DoorRoom cutoffs that maximize likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal (i.e. <1%). METHODS: We conducted the study over one year (8/13–8/14) using operations data for an ED with annual census ~50,000. For each study day, the LWBS endpoint (i.e. was LWBS <1%: “yes or no”) and the mean DoorRoom time were recorded. We categorized DoorRoom means by intervals starting with ≤10min and ending at >60min. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess for DoorRoom cutoffs predicting high LWBS, while adjusting for patient acuity (triage scores and admission %) and operations parameters. We used predictive marginal probability to assess utility of the regression-generated cutoffs. We defined statistical significance at p<0.05 and report odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Univariate results suggested a primary DoorRoom cutoff of 20′, to maintain a high likelihood (>85%) of meeting the LWBS goal. A secondary DoorRoom cutoff was indicated at 35′, to prevent a precipitous drop-off in likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal, from 61.1% at 35′ to 34.4% at 40′. Predictive marginal analysis using multivariate techniques to control for operational and patient-acuity factors confirmed the 20′ and 35′ cutoffs as significant (p<0.001). Days with DoorRoom between 21–35′ were 74% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom ≤20′ (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.13–0.53]). Days with DoorRoom >35′ were a further 75% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom of 21–35′ (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.15–0.41]). CONCLUSION: Operationally useful DoorRoom cutoffs can be identified, which allow for rational establishment of performance goals for the ED attempting to minimize LWBS. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015-09 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4644024/ /pubmed/26587080 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.25878 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pielsticker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Department Operations
Pielsticker, Shea
Whelan, Lori
Arthur, Annette O.
Thomas, Stephen
Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title_full Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title_fullStr Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title_short Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates
title_sort identifying patient door-to-room goals to minimize left-without-being-seen rates
topic Emergency Department Operations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587080
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.25878
work_keys_str_mv AT pielstickershea identifyingpatientdoortoroomgoalstominimizeleftwithoutbeingseenrates
AT whelanlori identifyingpatientdoortoroomgoalstominimizeleftwithoutbeingseenrates
AT arthurannetteo identifyingpatientdoortoroomgoalstominimizeleftwithoutbeingseenrates
AT thomasstephen identifyingpatientdoortoroomgoalstominimizeleftwithoutbeingseenrates