Cargando…

Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanders, Jason L., Noble, Vicki E., Raja, Ali S., Sullivan, Ashley F., Camargo, Carlos A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216
_version_ 1782400612233641984
author Sanders, Jason L.
Noble, Vicki E.
Raja, Ali S.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_facet Sanders, Jason L.
Noble, Vicki E.
Raja, Ali S.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_sort Sanders, Jason L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non-academic EDs to inform future strategies to increase PoC US utilization, particularly in non-academic centers. METHODS: In 2010, we surveyed ED directors in five states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wyoming; n=242 EDs) about general ED characteristics. In four states we determined barriers to PoC US use, proportion of EPs using PoC US, use privileges, and whether EPs can bill for PoC US. RESULTS: Response rates were >80% in each state. Overall, 47% of EDs reported PoC US availability. Availability varied by state, from 34% of EDs in Arkansas to 85% in Vermont. Availability was associated with higher ED visit volume, and percent of EPs who were board certified/board eligible in emergency medicine. The greatest barriers to use were limited training (70%), expense (39%), and limited need (perceived or real) (32%). When PoC US was used by EPs, 50% used it daily, 44% had privileges not requiring radiology confirmation, and 34% could bill separately for PoC US. Only 12% of EPs used it ≥80% of the time when placing central venous lines. CONCLUSION: Only 47% of EDs in our five-state sample of predominantly non-academic EDs had PoC US immediately available. When available, the greatest barriers to use were limited training, expense, and limited need. Recent educational and technical advancements may help overcome these barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4644045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46440452015-11-19 Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department Sanders, Jason L. Noble, Vicki E. Raja, Ali S. Sullivan, Ashley F. Camargo, Carlos A. West J Emerg Med Technology in Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non-academic EDs to inform future strategies to increase PoC US utilization, particularly in non-academic centers. METHODS: In 2010, we surveyed ED directors in five states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wyoming; n=242 EDs) about general ED characteristics. In four states we determined barriers to PoC US use, proportion of EPs using PoC US, use privileges, and whether EPs can bill for PoC US. RESULTS: Response rates were >80% in each state. Overall, 47% of EDs reported PoC US availability. Availability varied by state, from 34% of EDs in Arkansas to 85% in Vermont. Availability was associated with higher ED visit volume, and percent of EPs who were board certified/board eligible in emergency medicine. The greatest barriers to use were limited training (70%), expense (39%), and limited need (perceived or real) (32%). When PoC US was used by EPs, 50% used it daily, 44% had privileges not requiring radiology confirmation, and 34% could bill separately for PoC US. Only 12% of EPs used it ≥80% of the time when placing central venous lines. CONCLUSION: Only 47% of EDs in our five-state sample of predominantly non-academic EDs had PoC US immediately available. When available, the greatest barriers to use were limited training, expense, and limited need. Recent educational and technical advancements may help overcome these barriers. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015-09 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4644045/ /pubmed/26587101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sanders et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Technology in Emergency Medicine
Sanders, Jason L.
Noble, Vicki E.
Raja, Ali S.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Camargo, Carlos A.
Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title_full Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title_short Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
title_sort access to and use of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department
topic Technology in Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersjasonl accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment
AT noblevickie accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment
AT rajaalis accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment
AT sullivanashleyf accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment
AT camargocarlosa accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment