Cargando…
Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department
INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216 |
_version_ | 1782400612233641984 |
---|---|
author | Sanders, Jason L. Noble, Vicki E. Raja, Ali S. Sullivan, Ashley F. Camargo, Carlos A. |
author_facet | Sanders, Jason L. Noble, Vicki E. Raja, Ali S. Sullivan, Ashley F. Camargo, Carlos A. |
author_sort | Sanders, Jason L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non-academic EDs to inform future strategies to increase PoC US utilization, particularly in non-academic centers. METHODS: In 2010, we surveyed ED directors in five states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wyoming; n=242 EDs) about general ED characteristics. In four states we determined barriers to PoC US use, proportion of EPs using PoC US, use privileges, and whether EPs can bill for PoC US. RESULTS: Response rates were >80% in each state. Overall, 47% of EDs reported PoC US availability. Availability varied by state, from 34% of EDs in Arkansas to 85% in Vermont. Availability was associated with higher ED visit volume, and percent of EPs who were board certified/board eligible in emergency medicine. The greatest barriers to use were limited training (70%), expense (39%), and limited need (perceived or real) (32%). When PoC US was used by EPs, 50% used it daily, 44% had privileges not requiring radiology confirmation, and 34% could bill separately for PoC US. Only 12% of EPs used it ≥80% of the time when placing central venous lines. CONCLUSION: Only 47% of EDs in our five-state sample of predominantly non-academic EDs had PoC US immediately available. When available, the greatest barriers to use were limited training, expense, and limited need. Recent educational and technical advancements may help overcome these barriers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4644045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46440452015-11-19 Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department Sanders, Jason L. Noble, Vicki E. Raja, Ali S. Sullivan, Ashley F. Camargo, Carlos A. West J Emerg Med Technology in Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non-academic EDs to inform future strategies to increase PoC US utilization, particularly in non-academic centers. METHODS: In 2010, we surveyed ED directors in five states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wyoming; n=242 EDs) about general ED characteristics. In four states we determined barriers to PoC US use, proportion of EPs using PoC US, use privileges, and whether EPs can bill for PoC US. RESULTS: Response rates were >80% in each state. Overall, 47% of EDs reported PoC US availability. Availability varied by state, from 34% of EDs in Arkansas to 85% in Vermont. Availability was associated with higher ED visit volume, and percent of EPs who were board certified/board eligible in emergency medicine. The greatest barriers to use were limited training (70%), expense (39%), and limited need (perceived or real) (32%). When PoC US was used by EPs, 50% used it daily, 44% had privileges not requiring radiology confirmation, and 34% could bill separately for PoC US. Only 12% of EPs used it ≥80% of the time when placing central venous lines. CONCLUSION: Only 47% of EDs in our five-state sample of predominantly non-academic EDs had PoC US immediately available. When available, the greatest barriers to use were limited training, expense, and limited need. Recent educational and technical advancements may help overcome these barriers. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015-09 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4644045/ /pubmed/26587101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sanders et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Technology in Emergency Medicine Sanders, Jason L. Noble, Vicki E. Raja, Ali S. Sullivan, Ashley F. Camargo, Carlos A. Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title | Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title_full | Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title_short | Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | access to and use of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department |
topic | Technology in Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersjasonl accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment AT noblevickie accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment AT rajaalis accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment AT sullivanashleyf accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment AT camargocarlosa accesstoanduseofpointofcareultrasoundintheemergencydepartment |