Cargando…
A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609219 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332 |
_version_ | 1782400628898660352 |
---|---|
author | Salinger, Clifford L Gordon, Michael Jackson, Mitchell A Perl, Theodore Donnenfeld, Eric |
author_facet | Salinger, Clifford L Gordon, Michael Jackson, Mitchell A Perl, Theodore Donnenfeld, Eric |
author_sort | Salinger, Clifford L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at five refractive surgical centers in the USA. Data were collected from primary LASIK or PRK surgery cases in which LE gel was used postoperatively as the clinician’s routine standard of care and in which patients were followed-up for up to 6 months. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, surgical details, LE gel dosing regimen, pre- and postsurgical refractive characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, and visual acuity. Primary outcomes included postoperative IOP elevations, adverse events, and early discontinuations. RESULTS: Data were collected on 189 LASIK eyes (96 patients) and 209 PRK eyes (108 patients). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) years of age at surgery was 36.0 (11.7) and 33.9 (11.3) in LASIK and PRK patients. LE gel was prescribed most often four times daily during the first postoperative week, regardless of procedure; the most common treatment duration was 7–14 days in LASIK and ≥30 days in PRK patients. No unusual corneal findings or healing abnormalities were reported. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/24 in LASIK and 20/30 in PRK eyes. Mild/trace corneal haze was reported in 20% of PRK patients; two PRK patients with moderate/severe corneal haze were switched to another corticosteroid. Mean postoperative IOP did not increase over time in either LASIK or PRK eyes (P≥0.331); clinically significant elevations from baseline in IOP (≥10 mmHg) were noted in only three eyes of two PRK patients. CONCLUSION: LE gel appears to have a high level of safety and tolerability when used for the management of postoperative pain and inflammation following LASIK and PRK surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4644184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46441842015-11-25 A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery Salinger, Clifford L Gordon, Michael Jackson, Mitchell A Perl, Theodore Donnenfeld, Eric Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at five refractive surgical centers in the USA. Data were collected from primary LASIK or PRK surgery cases in which LE gel was used postoperatively as the clinician’s routine standard of care and in which patients were followed-up for up to 6 months. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, surgical details, LE gel dosing regimen, pre- and postsurgical refractive characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, and visual acuity. Primary outcomes included postoperative IOP elevations, adverse events, and early discontinuations. RESULTS: Data were collected on 189 LASIK eyes (96 patients) and 209 PRK eyes (108 patients). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) years of age at surgery was 36.0 (11.7) and 33.9 (11.3) in LASIK and PRK patients. LE gel was prescribed most often four times daily during the first postoperative week, regardless of procedure; the most common treatment duration was 7–14 days in LASIK and ≥30 days in PRK patients. No unusual corneal findings or healing abnormalities were reported. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/24 in LASIK and 20/30 in PRK eyes. Mild/trace corneal haze was reported in 20% of PRK patients; two PRK patients with moderate/severe corneal haze were switched to another corticosteroid. Mean postoperative IOP did not increase over time in either LASIK or PRK eyes (P≥0.331); clinically significant elevations from baseline in IOP (≥10 mmHg) were noted in only three eyes of two PRK patients. CONCLUSION: LE gel appears to have a high level of safety and tolerability when used for the management of postoperative pain and inflammation following LASIK and PRK surgery. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4644184/ /pubmed/26609219 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332 Text en © 2015 Salinger et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Salinger, Clifford L Gordon, Michael Jackson, Mitchell A Perl, Theodore Donnenfeld, Eric A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title | A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title_full | A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title_short | A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609219 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salingercliffordl aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT gordonmichael aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT jacksonmitchella aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT perltheodore aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT donnenfelderic aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT salingercliffordl retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT gordonmichael retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT jacksonmitchella retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT perltheodore retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery AT donnenfelderic retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery |