Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery

BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salinger, Clifford L, Gordon, Michael, Jackson, Mitchell A, Perl, Theodore, Donnenfeld, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609219
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332
_version_ 1782400628898660352
author Salinger, Clifford L
Gordon, Michael
Jackson, Mitchell A
Perl, Theodore
Donnenfeld, Eric
author_facet Salinger, Clifford L
Gordon, Michael
Jackson, Mitchell A
Perl, Theodore
Donnenfeld, Eric
author_sort Salinger, Clifford L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at five refractive surgical centers in the USA. Data were collected from primary LASIK or PRK surgery cases in which LE gel was used postoperatively as the clinician’s routine standard of care and in which patients were followed-up for up to 6 months. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, surgical details, LE gel dosing regimen, pre- and postsurgical refractive characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, and visual acuity. Primary outcomes included postoperative IOP elevations, adverse events, and early discontinuations. RESULTS: Data were collected on 189 LASIK eyes (96 patients) and 209 PRK eyes (108 patients). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) years of age at surgery was 36.0 (11.7) and 33.9 (11.3) in LASIK and PRK patients. LE gel was prescribed most often four times daily during the first postoperative week, regardless of procedure; the most common treatment duration was 7–14 days in LASIK and ≥30 days in PRK patients. No unusual corneal findings or healing abnormalities were reported. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/24 in LASIK and 20/30 in PRK eyes. Mild/trace corneal haze was reported in 20% of PRK patients; two PRK patients with moderate/severe corneal haze were switched to another corticosteroid. Mean postoperative IOP did not increase over time in either LASIK or PRK eyes (P≥0.331); clinically significant elevations from baseline in IOP (≥10 mmHg) were noted in only three eyes of two PRK patients. CONCLUSION: LE gel appears to have a high level of safety and tolerability when used for the management of postoperative pain and inflammation following LASIK and PRK surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4644184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46441842015-11-25 A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery Salinger, Clifford L Gordon, Michael Jackson, Mitchell A Perl, Theodore Donnenfeld, Eric Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at five refractive surgical centers in the USA. Data were collected from primary LASIK or PRK surgery cases in which LE gel was used postoperatively as the clinician’s routine standard of care and in which patients were followed-up for up to 6 months. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, surgical details, LE gel dosing regimen, pre- and postsurgical refractive characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, and visual acuity. Primary outcomes included postoperative IOP elevations, adverse events, and early discontinuations. RESULTS: Data were collected on 189 LASIK eyes (96 patients) and 209 PRK eyes (108 patients). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) years of age at surgery was 36.0 (11.7) and 33.9 (11.3) in LASIK and PRK patients. LE gel was prescribed most often four times daily during the first postoperative week, regardless of procedure; the most common treatment duration was 7–14 days in LASIK and ≥30 days in PRK patients. No unusual corneal findings or healing abnormalities were reported. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/24 in LASIK and 20/30 in PRK eyes. Mild/trace corneal haze was reported in 20% of PRK patients; two PRK patients with moderate/severe corneal haze were switched to another corticosteroid. Mean postoperative IOP did not increase over time in either LASIK or PRK eyes (P≥0.331); clinically significant elevations from baseline in IOP (≥10 mmHg) were noted in only three eyes of two PRK patients. CONCLUSION: LE gel appears to have a high level of safety and tolerability when used for the management of postoperative pain and inflammation following LASIK and PRK surgery. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4644184/ /pubmed/26609219 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332 Text en © 2015 Salinger et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Salinger, Clifford L
Gordon, Michael
Jackson, Mitchell A
Perl, Theodore
Donnenfeld, Eric
A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title_full A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title_short A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
title_sort retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609219
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94332
work_keys_str_mv AT salingercliffordl aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT gordonmichael aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT jacksonmitchella aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT perltheodore aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT donnenfelderic aretrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT salingercliffordl retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT gordonmichael retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT jacksonmitchella retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT perltheodore retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery
AT donnenfelderic retrospectiveanalysisofthepostoperativeuseofloteprednoletabonategel05followinglaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisorphotorefractivekeratectomysurgery