Cargando…

Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures

PURPOSE: Investigation of adverse events associated with anesthetic procedures is a method of quality control that identifies topics to improve clinical care and patient safety. Most research to date has been based on closed claim registries and anonymous reports which have specific limitations. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munting, Karin E., van Zaane, Bas, Schouten, Antonius N. J., van Wolfswinkel, Leo, de Graaff, Jurgen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0492-y
_version_ 1782400629136687104
author Munting, Karin E.
van Zaane, Bas
Schouten, Antonius N. J.
van Wolfswinkel, Leo
de Graaff, Jurgen C.
author_facet Munting, Karin E.
van Zaane, Bas
Schouten, Antonius N. J.
van Wolfswinkel, Leo
de Graaff, Jurgen C.
author_sort Munting, Karin E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Investigation of adverse events associated with anesthetic procedures is a method of quality control that identifies topics to improve clinical care and patient safety. Most research to date has been based on closed claim registries and anonymous reports which have specific limitations. Therefore, to evaluate a hospital’s reporting system, the present study was designed to describe critical incidents that anesthesiologists voluntarily and non-anonymously reported through an anesthesia information management system. METHODS: This is a historical observational cohort study on patients (age > 18 yr) undergoing anesthetic procedures in a tertiary referral hospital. A 20-item list of complications, as developed by the Netherlands Society of Anesthesiologists, was prospectively completed for each procedure. All critical incidents registered in the anesthesia information management system were then reclassified into 95 different critical incidents in a reproducible way. RESULTS: There were 110,310 procedures performed in 65,985 patients, and after excluding 158 reports that did not depict a critical incident, 3,904 critical incidents in 3,807 (3.5%) anesthetic procedures remained. Technical difficulties with regional anesthesia (n = 445; 40 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 44), hypotension (n = 432; 39 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% CI, 35 to 43), and unexpected difficult intubation (n = 216; 20 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% CI, 18 to 23) were the most frequently documented critical incidents. CONCLUSION: Accurate measurement and monitoring of critical incidents is crucial for patient safety. Despite the risk of underreporting and probable misclassification of manual reporting systems, our results give a comprehensive overview on the occurrence of voluntarily reported anesthesia-related critical incidents. This overview can direct development of a new reporting system and preventive strategies to decrease the future occurrence of critical incidents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4644187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46441872015-11-19 Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures Munting, Karin E. van Zaane, Bas Schouten, Antonius N. J. van Wolfswinkel, Leo de Graaff, Jurgen C. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Investigation of adverse events associated with anesthetic procedures is a method of quality control that identifies topics to improve clinical care and patient safety. Most research to date has been based on closed claim registries and anonymous reports which have specific limitations. Therefore, to evaluate a hospital’s reporting system, the present study was designed to describe critical incidents that anesthesiologists voluntarily and non-anonymously reported through an anesthesia information management system. METHODS: This is a historical observational cohort study on patients (age > 18 yr) undergoing anesthetic procedures in a tertiary referral hospital. A 20-item list of complications, as developed by the Netherlands Society of Anesthesiologists, was prospectively completed for each procedure. All critical incidents registered in the anesthesia information management system were then reclassified into 95 different critical incidents in a reproducible way. RESULTS: There were 110,310 procedures performed in 65,985 patients, and after excluding 158 reports that did not depict a critical incident, 3,904 critical incidents in 3,807 (3.5%) anesthetic procedures remained. Technical difficulties with regional anesthesia (n = 445; 40 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 44), hypotension (n = 432; 39 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% CI, 35 to 43), and unexpected difficult intubation (n = 216; 20 per 10,000 anesthetics; 95% CI, 18 to 23) were the most frequently documented critical incidents. CONCLUSION: Accurate measurement and monitoring of critical incidents is crucial for patient safety. Despite the risk of underreporting and probable misclassification of manual reporting systems, our results give a comprehensive overview on the occurrence of voluntarily reported anesthesia-related critical incidents. This overview can direct development of a new reporting system and preventive strategies to decrease the future occurrence of critical incidents. Springer US 2015-09-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4644187/ /pubmed/26407581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0492-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Munting, Karin E.
van Zaane, Bas
Schouten, Antonius N. J.
van Wolfswinkel, Leo
de Graaff, Jurgen C.
Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title_full Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title_fullStr Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title_full_unstemmed Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title_short Reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
title_sort reporting critical incidents in a tertiary hospital: a historical cohort study of 110,310 procedures
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0492-y
work_keys_str_mv AT muntingkarine reportingcriticalincidentsinatertiaryhospitalahistoricalcohortstudyof110310procedures
AT vanzaanebas reportingcriticalincidentsinatertiaryhospitalahistoricalcohortstudyof110310procedures
AT schoutenantoniusnj reportingcriticalincidentsinatertiaryhospitalahistoricalcohortstudyof110310procedures
AT vanwolfswinkelleo reportingcriticalincidentsinatertiaryhospitalahistoricalcohortstudyof110310procedures
AT degraaffjurgenc reportingcriticalincidentsinatertiaryhospitalahistoricalcohortstudyof110310procedures