Cargando…
Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set
The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed “selection history.” Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their phy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26178858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6 |
_version_ | 1782400635937751040 |
---|---|
author | Munneke, Jaap Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S. Theeuwes, Jan |
author_facet | Munneke, Jaap Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S. Theeuwes, Jan |
author_sort | Munneke, Jaap |
collection | PubMed |
description | The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed “selection history.” Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their physical attributes would predict. As such, the value that is associated with certain stimuli modulates attentional capture. This particular influence has also been shown for endogenous attention. Although recent leads have emerged, elucidating the influences of reward on exogenous and endogenous attention, it remains unclear to what extent exogenous attention is modulated by reward when endogenous attention is already deployed. We used a Posner cueing task in which exogenous and endogenous cues were presented to guide attention. Crucially, the exogenous cue also indicated the reward value. That is, the color of the exogenous cue indicated how much reward could be obtained on a given trial. The results showed main effects of endogenous and exogenous attention (i.e., speeded reaction times when either cue was valid, as compared to when it was invalid). Crucially, an interaction between exogenous cue validity and reward level was observed, indicating that reward-based associative-learning processes rapidly influence attentional capture, even when endogenous attention has been actively deployed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4644218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46442182015-11-19 Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set Munneke, Jaap Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S. Theeuwes, Jan Atten Percept Psychophys Article The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed “selection history.” Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their physical attributes would predict. As such, the value that is associated with certain stimuli modulates attentional capture. This particular influence has also been shown for endogenous attention. Although recent leads have emerged, elucidating the influences of reward on exogenous and endogenous attention, it remains unclear to what extent exogenous attention is modulated by reward when endogenous attention is already deployed. We used a Posner cueing task in which exogenous and endogenous cues were presented to guide attention. Crucially, the exogenous cue also indicated the reward value. That is, the color of the exogenous cue indicated how much reward could be obtained on a given trial. The results showed main effects of endogenous and exogenous attention (i.e., speeded reaction times when either cue was valid, as compared to when it was invalid). Crucially, an interaction between exogenous cue validity and reward level was observed, indicating that reward-based associative-learning processes rapidly influence attentional capture, even when endogenous attention has been actively deployed. Springer US 2015-07-16 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4644218/ /pubmed/26178858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Munneke, Jaap Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S. Theeuwes, Jan Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title | Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title_full | Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title_fullStr | Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title_full_unstemmed | Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title_short | Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
title_sort | reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26178858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munnekejaap rewardcanmodulateattentionalcaptureindependentoftopdownset AT hoppenbrouwerssylcos rewardcanmodulateattentionalcaptureindependentoftopdownset AT theeuwesjan rewardcanmodulateattentionalcaptureindependentoftopdownset |