Cargando…
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specif...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188 |
_version_ | 1782400694804807680 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Juneyoung Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Sang Hyun Huh, Jimi Park, Seong Ho |
author_facet | Lee, Juneyoung Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Sang Hyun Huh, Jimi Park, Seong Ho |
author_sort | Lee, Juneyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated and could be affected by a threshold effect, more sophisticated statistical methods are required for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Hierarchical models including the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model are increasingly being accepted as standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We provide a conceptual review of statistical methods currently used and recommended for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. This article could serve as a methodological reference for those who perform systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4644739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46447392015-11-16 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis Lee, Juneyoung Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Sang Hyun Huh, Jimi Park, Seong Ho Korean J Radiol Experimental and Others Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated and could be affected by a threshold effect, more sophisticated statistical methods are required for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Hierarchical models including the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model are increasingly being accepted as standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We provide a conceptual review of statistical methods currently used and recommended for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. This article could serve as a methodological reference for those who perform systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. The Korean Society of Radiology 2015 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4644739/ /pubmed/26576107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Experimental and Others Lee, Juneyoung Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Sang Hyun Huh, Jimi Park, Seong Ho Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part ii. statistical methods of meta-analysis |
topic | Experimental and Others |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejuneyoung systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingdiagnostictestaccuracyapracticalreviewforclinicalresearcherspartiistatisticalmethodsofmetaanalysis AT kimkyungwon systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingdiagnostictestaccuracyapracticalreviewforclinicalresearcherspartiistatisticalmethodsofmetaanalysis AT choisanghyun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingdiagnostictestaccuracyapracticalreviewforclinicalresearcherspartiistatisticalmethodsofmetaanalysis AT huhjimi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingdiagnostictestaccuracyapracticalreviewforclinicalresearcherspartiistatisticalmethodsofmetaanalysis AT parkseongho systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingdiagnostictestaccuracyapracticalreviewforclinicalresearcherspartiistatisticalmethodsofmetaanalysis |