Cargando…

Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion, as the first step for Class II malocclusion treatment. METHODS: The sample comprised 61 patients divided into three groups: Group 1, combined headgear (CH); Gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farret, Milton Meri Benitez, de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli, Farret, Marcel M., de Araújo, Laura Lutz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.043-049.oar
_version_ 1782400723015696384
author Farret, Milton Meri Benitez
de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli
Farret, Marcel M.
de Araújo, Laura Lutz
author_facet Farret, Milton Meri Benitez
de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli
Farret, Marcel M.
de Araújo, Laura Lutz
author_sort Farret, Milton Meri Benitez
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion, as the first step for Class II malocclusion treatment. METHODS: The sample comprised 61 patients divided into three groups: Group 1, combined headgear (CH); Group 2, CH + rapid maxillary expansion (CH + RME); and Group 3, control (CG). In Group 1, patients were treated with combined headgear until Class I molar relationship was achieved. In Group 2, the protocol for headgear was the same; however, patients were previously subject to rapid maxillary expansion. RESULTS: Results showed distal displacement of maxillary molars for both experimental groups (p < 0.001), with distal tipping only in Group 1 (CH) (p < 0.001). There was restriction of forward maxillary growth in Group 2 (CH + RME) (p < 0.05) and clockwise rotation of the maxilla in Group 1 (CH) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, it is possible to suggest that treatment with both protocols was efficient; however, results were more significant for Group 2 (CH + RME) with less side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4644918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46449182015-11-23 Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion Farret, Milton Meri Benitez de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli Farret, Marcel M. de Araújo, Laura Lutz Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion, as the first step for Class II malocclusion treatment. METHODS: The sample comprised 61 patients divided into three groups: Group 1, combined headgear (CH); Group 2, CH + rapid maxillary expansion (CH + RME); and Group 3, control (CG). In Group 1, patients were treated with combined headgear until Class I molar relationship was achieved. In Group 2, the protocol for headgear was the same; however, patients were previously subject to rapid maxillary expansion. RESULTS: Results showed distal displacement of maxillary molars for both experimental groups (p < 0.001), with distal tipping only in Group 1 (CH) (p < 0.001). There was restriction of forward maxillary growth in Group 2 (CH + RME) (p < 0.05) and clockwise rotation of the maxilla in Group 1 (CH) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, it is possible to suggest that treatment with both protocols was efficient; however, results were more significant for Group 2 (CH + RME) with less side effects. Dental Press International 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4644918/ /pubmed/26560820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.043-049.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Farret, Milton Meri Benitez
de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli
Farret, Marcel M.
de Araújo, Laura Lutz
Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title_full Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title_fullStr Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title_full_unstemmed Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title_short Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
title_sort dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.043-049.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT farretmiltonmeribenitez dentalandskeletaleffectsofcombinedheadgearusedaloneorinassociationwithrapidmaxillaryexpansion
AT delimaeduardomartinelli dentalandskeletaleffectsofcombinedheadgearusedaloneorinassociationwithrapidmaxillaryexpansion
AT farretmarcelm dentalandskeletaleffectsofcombinedheadgearusedaloneorinassociationwithrapidmaxillaryexpansion
AT dearaujolauralutz dentalandskeletaleffectsofcombinedheadgearusedaloneorinassociationwithrapidmaxillaryexpansion