Cargando…

Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ultrasound (US)-guided regional blocks are becoming increasingly popular as its use increases success rate, shortens block onset time and reduces complications. Currently, there exist two methods to perform US-guided axillary brachial plexus block (US-ABPB), the perivascular (PV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambi, Uday, Bhanupriya, PVV, Hulkund, Shivanand Y, Prakashappa, DS
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644614
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.167476
_version_ 1782400805904580608
author Ambi, Uday
Bhanupriya, PVV
Hulkund, Shivanand Y
Prakashappa, DS
author_facet Ambi, Uday
Bhanupriya, PVV
Hulkund, Shivanand Y
Prakashappa, DS
author_sort Ambi, Uday
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ultrasound (US)-guided regional blocks are becoming increasingly popular as its use increases success rate, shortens block onset time and reduces complications. Currently, there exist two methods to perform US-guided axillary brachial plexus block (US-ABPB), the perivascular (PV) and the perineural (PN) techniques. We compared the two techniques to study the block characteristics and other variables using levobupivacaine. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised trial, 60 patients were randomly allocated to receive a PV (n = 30) or PN (n = 30) US-ABPB. The local anaesthetic agent, 0.5% levobupivacaine and total volume of 36 ml of solution were identical in all the subjects. For both the groups, the musculocutaneous nerve was first located and then anaesthetised with 6 ml. Subsequently in the PV group, 30 ml was deposited dorsal to the axillary artery (6 o’clock position). In PN group, the median, ulnar and radial nerves were individually anaesthetised with volumes of 10 ml each. The onset and duration of sensory block, the onset and duration of motor block, number of failed blocks and complications were noted. RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of success rate (PV - 93.33%, PN - 96.66%), sensory onset (PN: 8.07 (standard deviation [SD] ± 0.651) min and PV: 8.14 [SD ± 1.079] min; P = 0.754), motor onset (PN: 14.62 [SD ± 2.077] min and PV: 14.93 [SD ± 1.844] min; P = 0.557) and total duration of anaesthesia. No complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The PV technique provides a simple alternative for PN US-ABPB. In the light of emerging needling positions for PV and PN techniques, this study calls for large scale trials and much research in this area before one defines best or safe approach. PV technique may be considered as an alternative method for US-ABPB in patients with anatomical variation or difficulties in identifying the individual nerves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46453552015-12-07 Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study Ambi, Uday Bhanupriya, PVV Hulkund, Shivanand Y Prakashappa, DS Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ultrasound (US)-guided regional blocks are becoming increasingly popular as its use increases success rate, shortens block onset time and reduces complications. Currently, there exist two methods to perform US-guided axillary brachial plexus block (US-ABPB), the perivascular (PV) and the perineural (PN) techniques. We compared the two techniques to study the block characteristics and other variables using levobupivacaine. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised trial, 60 patients were randomly allocated to receive a PV (n = 30) or PN (n = 30) US-ABPB. The local anaesthetic agent, 0.5% levobupivacaine and total volume of 36 ml of solution were identical in all the subjects. For both the groups, the musculocutaneous nerve was first located and then anaesthetised with 6 ml. Subsequently in the PV group, 30 ml was deposited dorsal to the axillary artery (6 o’clock position). In PN group, the median, ulnar and radial nerves were individually anaesthetised with volumes of 10 ml each. The onset and duration of sensory block, the onset and duration of motor block, number of failed blocks and complications were noted. RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of success rate (PV - 93.33%, PN - 96.66%), sensory onset (PN: 8.07 (standard deviation [SD] ± 0.651) min and PV: 8.14 [SD ± 1.079] min; P = 0.754), motor onset (PN: 14.62 [SD ± 2.077] min and PV: 14.93 [SD ± 1.844] min; P = 0.557) and total duration of anaesthesia. No complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The PV technique provides a simple alternative for PN US-ABPB. In the light of emerging needling positions for PV and PN techniques, this study calls for large scale trials and much research in this area before one defines best or safe approach. PV technique may be considered as an alternative method for US-ABPB in patients with anatomical variation or difficulties in identifying the individual nerves. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4645355/ /pubmed/26644614 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.167476 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Ambi, Uday
Bhanupriya, PVV
Hulkund, Shivanand Y
Prakashappa, DS
Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title_full Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title_fullStr Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title_short Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomised clinical study
title_sort comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: a prospective, randomised clinical study
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644614
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.167476
work_keys_str_mv AT ambiuday comparisonbetweenperivascularandperineuralultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockusinglevobupivacaineaprospectiverandomisedclinicalstudy
AT bhanupriyapvv comparisonbetweenperivascularandperineuralultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockusinglevobupivacaineaprospectiverandomisedclinicalstudy
AT hulkundshivanandy comparisonbetweenperivascularandperineuralultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockusinglevobupivacaineaprospectiverandomisedclinicalstudy
AT prakashappads comparisonbetweenperivascularandperineuralultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockusinglevobupivacaineaprospectiverandomisedclinicalstudy