Cargando…

Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health

BACKGROUND: It has previously been reported that many research articles fail to fulfill important criteria for statistical analyses, but, to date, these reports have not focused on public health problems. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of reporting and use of statistical method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Norström, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-015-0096-6
_version_ 1782400822067331072
author Norström, Fredrik
author_facet Norström, Fredrik
author_sort Norström, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has previously been reported that many research articles fail to fulfill important criteria for statistical analyses, but, to date, these reports have not focused on public health problems. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of reporting and use of statistical methods in articles analyzing the effect of unemployment on health. METHODS: Forty-one articles were identified and evaluated in terms of how they addressed 12 specified criteria. RESULTS: For most of these criteria, the majority of articles were inadequate. These criteria were conformity with a linear gradient (100 % of the articles), validation of the statistical model (100 %), collinearity of independent variables (97 %), fitting procedure (93 %), goodness of fit test (78 %), selection of variables (68 % for the candidate model; 88 % for the final model), and interactions between independent variables (66 %). Fewer, but still alarmingly many articles, failed to fulfill the criteria coefficients presented in statistical models (48 %), coding of variables (34 %) and discussion of methodological concerns (24 %). There was a lack of explicit reporting of statistical significance/confidence intervals; 34 % of the articles only presented p-values as being above or below the significance level, and 42 % did not present confidence intervals. Events per variable was the only criterion met at an undoubtedly acceptable level (2.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: There were critical methodological shortcomings in the reviewed studies. It is difficult to obtain unbiased estimates, but there clearly needs to be some improvement in the quality of documentation on the use and performance of statistical methods. A suggestion here is that journals not only demand that articles fulfill the criteria within the STROBE statement, but that they include additional criteria to decrease the risk of incorrect conclusions being drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13690-015-0096-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46454802015-11-17 Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health Norström, Fredrik Arch Public Health Research BACKGROUND: It has previously been reported that many research articles fail to fulfill important criteria for statistical analyses, but, to date, these reports have not focused on public health problems. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of reporting and use of statistical methods in articles analyzing the effect of unemployment on health. METHODS: Forty-one articles were identified and evaluated in terms of how they addressed 12 specified criteria. RESULTS: For most of these criteria, the majority of articles were inadequate. These criteria were conformity with a linear gradient (100 % of the articles), validation of the statistical model (100 %), collinearity of independent variables (97 %), fitting procedure (93 %), goodness of fit test (78 %), selection of variables (68 % for the candidate model; 88 % for the final model), and interactions between independent variables (66 %). Fewer, but still alarmingly many articles, failed to fulfill the criteria coefficients presented in statistical models (48 %), coding of variables (34 %) and discussion of methodological concerns (24 %). There was a lack of explicit reporting of statistical significance/confidence intervals; 34 % of the articles only presented p-values as being above or below the significance level, and 42 % did not present confidence intervals. Events per variable was the only criterion met at an undoubtedly acceptable level (2.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: There were critical methodological shortcomings in the reviewed studies. It is difficult to obtain unbiased estimates, but there clearly needs to be some improvement in the quality of documentation on the use and performance of statistical methods. A suggestion here is that journals not only demand that articles fulfill the criteria within the STROBE statement, but that they include additional criteria to decrease the risk of incorrect conclusions being drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13690-015-0096-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4645480/ /pubmed/26576268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-015-0096-6 Text en © Norström. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Norström, Fredrik
Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title_full Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title_fullStr Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title_full_unstemmed Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title_short Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
title_sort poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health – the case of unemployment and health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-015-0096-6
work_keys_str_mv AT norstromfredrik poorqualityinthereportinganduseofstatisticalmethodsinpublichealththecaseofunemploymentandhealth