Cargando…

Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU

Anaemia in intensive care is common, with approximately 50% of patients receiving a red cell transfusion. Recognised complications from transfusion include ‘transfusion associated lung injury’, infection, and organ failure progression. Most cohort studies show a positive relationship between red cel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Sethina, Kendrick, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202106.w1109
_version_ 1782400845205209088
author Watson, Sethina
Kendrick, Kate
author_facet Watson, Sethina
Kendrick, Kate
author_sort Watson, Sethina
collection PubMed
description Anaemia in intensive care is common, with approximately 50% of patients receiving a red cell transfusion. Recognised complications from transfusion include ‘transfusion associated lung injury’, infection, and organ failure progression. Most cohort studies show a positive relationship between red cell transfusion and adverse outcomes. In 2012, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology issued guidelines for red cell (RBC) transfusion in critical care. They recommend a haemoglobin transfusion trigger of below 70 g/dL unless the patient is bleeding, has acute sepsis, neurological injury, or an acute coronary syndrome. RBC transfusions in a single intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively assessed for compliance with national guidance. Each transfusion was categorised with a traffic light system: red for inappropriate, green for appropriate, and amber for those that were not clearly appropriate or inappropriate. The quality improvement project began with a clinical effectiveness audit of doctors' knowledge of critical care transfusion thresholds. Two quality improvement interventions were used: 1) a local blood transfusion guideline was produced and posters were placed in the ICU 2) this guidance was attached to the transfusion prescriptions. Data was collected after each intervention. A total of 30 random adult RBC transfusions were analysed between August 2013 and February 2014. Despite good results from the effectiveness audit an assessment of RBC transfusions demonstrated room for improvement. Prior to introduction of the guideline intervention, a total of two transfusions were green, one red and seven amber. Following both interventions there were seven green transfusions and three amber. No transfusions were classed as inappropriate. According to additional trust based ICU transfusion records, there was approximately a 50% reduction (41 to 18 RBC transfusions) in overall blood transfusions following the first intervention in October 2013. Simple interventions to raise awareness such as surveys, posters, and reminders can dramatically improve RBC prescribing in accordance to evidence based guidelines. Making prescribers aware of guidelines can dramatically reduce the total number of overall transfusions and increase transfusion appropriateness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46456912016-01-05 Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU Watson, Sethina Kendrick, Kate BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Anaemia in intensive care is common, with approximately 50% of patients receiving a red cell transfusion. Recognised complications from transfusion include ‘transfusion associated lung injury’, infection, and organ failure progression. Most cohort studies show a positive relationship between red cell transfusion and adverse outcomes. In 2012, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology issued guidelines for red cell (RBC) transfusion in critical care. They recommend a haemoglobin transfusion trigger of below 70 g/dL unless the patient is bleeding, has acute sepsis, neurological injury, or an acute coronary syndrome. RBC transfusions in a single intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively assessed for compliance with national guidance. Each transfusion was categorised with a traffic light system: red for inappropriate, green for appropriate, and amber for those that were not clearly appropriate or inappropriate. The quality improvement project began with a clinical effectiveness audit of doctors' knowledge of critical care transfusion thresholds. Two quality improvement interventions were used: 1) a local blood transfusion guideline was produced and posters were placed in the ICU 2) this guidance was attached to the transfusion prescriptions. Data was collected after each intervention. A total of 30 random adult RBC transfusions were analysed between August 2013 and February 2014. Despite good results from the effectiveness audit an assessment of RBC transfusions demonstrated room for improvement. Prior to introduction of the guideline intervention, a total of two transfusions were green, one red and seven amber. Following both interventions there were seven green transfusions and three amber. No transfusions were classed as inappropriate. According to additional trust based ICU transfusion records, there was approximately a 50% reduction (41 to 18 RBC transfusions) in overall blood transfusions following the first intervention in October 2013. Simple interventions to raise awareness such as surveys, posters, and reminders can dramatically improve RBC prescribing in accordance to evidence based guidelines. Making prescribers aware of guidelines can dramatically reduce the total number of overall transfusions and increase transfusion appropriateness. British Publishing Group 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4645691/ /pubmed/26734254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202106.w1109 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Watson, Sethina
Kendrick, Kate
Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title_full Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title_fullStr Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title_full_unstemmed Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title_short Management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in ICU
title_sort management of anaemia and blood transfusion in critical care - implementing national guidelines in icu
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202106.w1109
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonsethina managementofanaemiaandbloodtransfusionincriticalcareimplementingnationalguidelinesinicu
AT kendrickkate managementofanaemiaandbloodtransfusionincriticalcareimplementingnationalguidelinesinicu