Cargando…

Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care

Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zucco, Liana, Webb, Carly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496
_version_ 1782400846111178752
author Zucco, Liana
Webb, Carly
author_facet Zucco, Liana
Webb, Carly
author_sort Zucco, Liana
collection PubMed
description Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. However, an initial audit of the daily review demonstrated an average completion rate of only 57%, with several aspects of care consistently missed, most notably: eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (44% and 40%, respectively), glucose control (33%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (54%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (24%). The current system relied on doctors learning the requirements for the clerking and remembering to document them all. It is known that there is a low level of reliability in successfully applying proven medical evidence; this is partly explained by dependence on vigilance and hard work by the clinician, and absence of checklists and protocols to reduce the impact of human factors on results. The majority of doctors on the unit believe they consistently record all items of this checklist, highlighting the gap between the ideal that clinicians strive towards and the outcome. An abbreviated daily review checklist was therefore implemented in the form of a laminated bookmark into the medical notes, to act as a reminder of the items that should be considered in the daily review and prompt subsequent documentation. Bookmarks were implemented over two PDSA cycles and medical notes re-audited. Post-intervention, the documentation of the daily review improved to an overall completion rate of >77%, with notable improvements in eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (89%, 95% respectively), glucose control (67%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (100%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (43%). The daily review checklist concisely summarised onto bookmarks were cheap and simple to create, durable and easy to use, and improved the overall documentation of the daily review. The effect of this outcome remains untested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46456952016-01-05 Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care Zucco, Liana Webb, Carly BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. However, an initial audit of the daily review demonstrated an average completion rate of only 57%, with several aspects of care consistently missed, most notably: eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (44% and 40%, respectively), glucose control (33%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (54%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (24%). The current system relied on doctors learning the requirements for the clerking and remembering to document them all. It is known that there is a low level of reliability in successfully applying proven medical evidence; this is partly explained by dependence on vigilance and hard work by the clinician, and absence of checklists and protocols to reduce the impact of human factors on results. The majority of doctors on the unit believe they consistently record all items of this checklist, highlighting the gap between the ideal that clinicians strive towards and the outcome. An abbreviated daily review checklist was therefore implemented in the form of a laminated bookmark into the medical notes, to act as a reminder of the items that should be considered in the daily review and prompt subsequent documentation. Bookmarks were implemented over two PDSA cycles and medical notes re-audited. Post-intervention, the documentation of the daily review improved to an overall completion rate of >77%, with notable improvements in eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (89%, 95% respectively), glucose control (67%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (100%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (43%). The daily review checklist concisely summarised onto bookmarks were cheap and simple to create, durable and easy to use, and improved the overall documentation of the daily review. The effect of this outcome remains untested. British Publishing Group 2014-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4645695/ /pubmed/26732891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Zucco, Liana
Webb, Carly
Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title_full Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title_fullStr Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title_short Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
title_sort improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496
work_keys_str_mv AT zuccoliana improvingthedocumentationofthedailyreviewofpatientsingeneralintensivecare
AT webbcarly improvingthedocumentationofthedailyreviewofpatientsingeneralintensivecare