Cargando…
Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care
Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. Howe...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496 |
_version_ | 1782400846111178752 |
---|---|
author | Zucco, Liana Webb, Carly |
author_facet | Zucco, Liana Webb, Carly |
author_sort | Zucco, Liana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. However, an initial audit of the daily review demonstrated an average completion rate of only 57%, with several aspects of care consistently missed, most notably: eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (44% and 40%, respectively), glucose control (33%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (54%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (24%). The current system relied on doctors learning the requirements for the clerking and remembering to document them all. It is known that there is a low level of reliability in successfully applying proven medical evidence; this is partly explained by dependence on vigilance and hard work by the clinician, and absence of checklists and protocols to reduce the impact of human factors on results. The majority of doctors on the unit believe they consistently record all items of this checklist, highlighting the gap between the ideal that clinicians strive towards and the outcome. An abbreviated daily review checklist was therefore implemented in the form of a laminated bookmark into the medical notes, to act as a reminder of the items that should be considered in the daily review and prompt subsequent documentation. Bookmarks were implemented over two PDSA cycles and medical notes re-audited. Post-intervention, the documentation of the daily review improved to an overall completion rate of >77%, with notable improvements in eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (89%, 95% respectively), glucose control (67%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (100%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (43%). The daily review checklist concisely summarised onto bookmarks were cheap and simple to create, durable and easy to use, and improved the overall documentation of the daily review. The effect of this outcome remains untested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46456952016-01-05 Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care Zucco, Liana Webb, Carly BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Following the daily review of patients on the general intensive care unit (GICU), ongoing issues are addressed and a management plan formulated. Within our unit, the documentation of this daily review is freehand and should include all items covered within the local GICU daily review checklist. However, an initial audit of the daily review demonstrated an average completion rate of only 57%, with several aspects of care consistently missed, most notably: eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (44% and 40%, respectively), glucose control (33%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (54%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (24%). The current system relied on doctors learning the requirements for the clerking and remembering to document them all. It is known that there is a low level of reliability in successfully applying proven medical evidence; this is partly explained by dependence on vigilance and hard work by the clinician, and absence of checklists and protocols to reduce the impact of human factors on results. The majority of doctors on the unit believe they consistently record all items of this checklist, highlighting the gap between the ideal that clinicians strive towards and the outcome. An abbreviated daily review checklist was therefore implemented in the form of a laminated bookmark into the medical notes, to act as a reminder of the items that should be considered in the daily review and prompt subsequent documentation. Bookmarks were implemented over two PDSA cycles and medical notes re-audited. Post-intervention, the documentation of the daily review improved to an overall completion rate of >77%, with notable improvements in eye and mouth care in ventilated patients (89%, 95% respectively), glucose control (67%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (100%), and inspection and need for peripheral and central lines (43%). The daily review checklist concisely summarised onto bookmarks were cheap and simple to create, durable and easy to use, and improved the overall documentation of the daily review. The effect of this outcome remains untested. British Publishing Group 2014-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4645695/ /pubmed/26732891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Zucco, Liana Webb, Carly Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title | Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title_full | Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title_fullStr | Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title_short | Improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
title_sort | improving the documentation of the daily review of patients in general intensive care |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u539.w496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zuccoliana improvingthedocumentationofthedailyreviewofpatientsingeneralintensivecare AT webbcarly improvingthedocumentationofthedailyreviewofpatientsingeneralintensivecare |