Cargando…

Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics

Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganatra, Bella, Manoharan, Dishan, Akhras, Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644
_version_ 1782400867719184384
author Ganatra, Bella
Manoharan, Dishan
Akhras, Victoria
author_facet Ganatra, Bella
Manoharan, Dishan
Akhras, Victoria
author_sort Ganatra, Bella
collection PubMed
description Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this by the annual use of a validated screening tool such as psoriasis epidemiological screening tool (PEST) on all psoriasis patients without PA. We introduced the PEST into our dermatology department since there was no established system of screening for PA. Twenty-one percent of patients that were identified through PEST as requiring a referral at baseline were not referred to rheumatology through the current system without PEST. This represented a significantly missed proportion of patients with possible PA. Using the PDSA cycle method, we introduced the PEST into cycle 1 and educated key staff about the tool. All eligible patients were referred appropriately. Through doctor and patient feedback, changes were adopted for cycle 2 and informative emails to all key staff about PEST were sent. We noted a drop in the number of PEST uptake in this cycle possibly due to lack of awareness on the purpose and use of PEST among staff, across the department. An educational teaching session was delivered to a wider audience and posters were placed in strategic areas of the department prior to the final cycle. This resulted in 100% PEST uptake and 100% of those with a score of >3 being referred. A total of 51 patients were studied, comprising of 30 eligible patients for PEST. Of these, 27 patients were actually screened (90%) and five with a PEST score of ≥ 3 were identified and referred appropriately (18.5%). We felt this represented a successful outcome in increasing PEST uptake within the department and in capturing a significant proportion of patients at risk of PA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46457982016-01-05 Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics Ganatra, Bella Manoharan, Dishan Akhras, Victoria BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this by the annual use of a validated screening tool such as psoriasis epidemiological screening tool (PEST) on all psoriasis patients without PA. We introduced the PEST into our dermatology department since there was no established system of screening for PA. Twenty-one percent of patients that were identified through PEST as requiring a referral at baseline were not referred to rheumatology through the current system without PEST. This represented a significantly missed proportion of patients with possible PA. Using the PDSA cycle method, we introduced the PEST into cycle 1 and educated key staff about the tool. All eligible patients were referred appropriately. Through doctor and patient feedback, changes were adopted for cycle 2 and informative emails to all key staff about PEST were sent. We noted a drop in the number of PEST uptake in this cycle possibly due to lack of awareness on the purpose and use of PEST among staff, across the department. An educational teaching session was delivered to a wider audience and posters were placed in strategic areas of the department prior to the final cycle. This resulted in 100% PEST uptake and 100% of those with a score of >3 being referred. A total of 51 patients were studied, comprising of 30 eligible patients for PEST. Of these, 27 patients were actually screened (90%) and five with a PEST score of ≥ 3 were identified and referred appropriately (18.5%). We felt this represented a successful outcome in increasing PEST uptake within the department and in capturing a significant proportion of patients at risk of PA. British Publishing Group 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4645798/ /pubmed/26734320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Ganatra, Bella
Manoharan, Dishan
Akhras, Victoria
Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title_full Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title_fullStr Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title_full_unstemmed Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title_short Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
title_sort use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644
work_keys_str_mv AT ganatrabella useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics
AT manoharandishan useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics
AT akhrasvictoria useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics