Cargando…
Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics
Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644 |
_version_ | 1782400867719184384 |
---|---|
author | Ganatra, Bella Manoharan, Dishan Akhras, Victoria |
author_facet | Ganatra, Bella Manoharan, Dishan Akhras, Victoria |
author_sort | Ganatra, Bella |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this by the annual use of a validated screening tool such as psoriasis epidemiological screening tool (PEST) on all psoriasis patients without PA. We introduced the PEST into our dermatology department since there was no established system of screening for PA. Twenty-one percent of patients that were identified through PEST as requiring a referral at baseline were not referred to rheumatology through the current system without PEST. This represented a significantly missed proportion of patients with possible PA. Using the PDSA cycle method, we introduced the PEST into cycle 1 and educated key staff about the tool. All eligible patients were referred appropriately. Through doctor and patient feedback, changes were adopted for cycle 2 and informative emails to all key staff about PEST were sent. We noted a drop in the number of PEST uptake in this cycle possibly due to lack of awareness on the purpose and use of PEST among staff, across the department. An educational teaching session was delivered to a wider audience and posters were placed in strategic areas of the department prior to the final cycle. This resulted in 100% PEST uptake and 100% of those with a score of >3 being referred. A total of 51 patients were studied, comprising of 30 eligible patients for PEST. Of these, 27 patients were actually screened (90%) and five with a PEST score of ≥ 3 were identified and referred appropriately (18.5%). We felt this represented a successful outcome in increasing PEST uptake within the department and in capturing a significant proportion of patients at risk of PA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46457982016-01-05 Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics Ganatra, Bella Manoharan, Dishan Akhras, Victoria BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Dermatology clinics represent a key opportunity to screen patients with psoriasis for psoriatic arthritis (PA) which often remains unrecognised. A significant proportion of adults with psoriasis develop arthropathy [5] with around two-thirds having progressive arthritis.[6] NICE has recognised this by the annual use of a validated screening tool such as psoriasis epidemiological screening tool (PEST) on all psoriasis patients without PA. We introduced the PEST into our dermatology department since there was no established system of screening for PA. Twenty-one percent of patients that were identified through PEST as requiring a referral at baseline were not referred to rheumatology through the current system without PEST. This represented a significantly missed proportion of patients with possible PA. Using the PDSA cycle method, we introduced the PEST into cycle 1 and educated key staff about the tool. All eligible patients were referred appropriately. Through doctor and patient feedback, changes were adopted for cycle 2 and informative emails to all key staff about PEST were sent. We noted a drop in the number of PEST uptake in this cycle possibly due to lack of awareness on the purpose and use of PEST among staff, across the department. An educational teaching session was delivered to a wider audience and posters were placed in strategic areas of the department prior to the final cycle. This resulted in 100% PEST uptake and 100% of those with a score of >3 being referred. A total of 51 patients were studied, comprising of 30 eligible patients for PEST. Of these, 27 patients were actually screened (90%) and five with a PEST score of ≥ 3 were identified and referred appropriately (18.5%). We felt this represented a successful outcome in increasing PEST uptake within the department and in capturing a significant proportion of patients at risk of PA. British Publishing Group 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4645798/ /pubmed/26734320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Ganatra, Bella Manoharan, Dishan Akhras, Victoria Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title | Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title_full | Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title_fullStr | Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title_short | Use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
title_sort | use of a validated screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in dermatology clinics |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203335.w2644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganatrabella useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics AT manoharandishan useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics AT akhrasvictoria useofavalidatedscreeningtoolforpsoriaticarthritisindermatologyclinics |