Cargando…

Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department

Anecdotal evidence suggested that the management of patients with eye complaints in the Emergency Department (ED) at King's College Hospital, London was suboptimal. Acute ophthalmology is often poorly covered at undergraduate level in the United Kingdom which can affect patient safety. Furtherm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saifuddin, Aamir, Brookes, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201656.w1962
_version_ 1782400879345795072
author Saifuddin, Aamir
Brookes, Rachel
author_facet Saifuddin, Aamir
Brookes, Rachel
author_sort Saifuddin, Aamir
collection PubMed
description Anecdotal evidence suggested that the management of patients with eye complaints in the Emergency Department (ED) at King's College Hospital, London was suboptimal. Acute ophthalmology is often poorly covered at undergraduate level in the United Kingdom which can affect patient safety. Furthermore, it was notoriously difficult to obtain specialist advice within working hours. Contact lens (CL) wearers are prone to Pseudomonas conjunctivitis which requires certain antibiotics and mismanagement of this has led to sight-threatening consequences locally. Junior doctor surveys suggested under-confidence in managing eye problems and initial audit showed that eye assessments are frequently incomplete during ED clerkings. For example, CL status and visual acuity were documented in 63% and 77% of cases respectively; however, these were increased when a dedicated pro forma was used. To address these multiple issues, a new ‘eye examination pro forma’ was created, along with integrated clinical guidelines based on local expert practice. This would prompt staff to elicit key information to help guide management. A new referral pathway was also introduced to facilitate access to ophthalmology services. On re-auditing seven months later, the new pro forma was completed for only 28% of patients, though this was associated with a higher rate of documentation of all parameters. The referral pathways worked efficiently and patients with red flag features were identified and managed more appropriately than before. We learnt that it is important that someone personally drives the innovations from the outset, otherwise prolonged change is difficult. Secondly, junior doctors may not be proficient with slit lamp use, for instance, so targeted teaching is required, not simply new pathways. Full engagement with the pro forma and effective patient management should then improve simultaneously. Specific teaching is now being implemented and permanent staff have been recruited to oversee the project. We plan to re-audit in November 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46458512016-01-05 Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department Saifuddin, Aamir Brookes, Rachel BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Anecdotal evidence suggested that the management of patients with eye complaints in the Emergency Department (ED) at King's College Hospital, London was suboptimal. Acute ophthalmology is often poorly covered at undergraduate level in the United Kingdom which can affect patient safety. Furthermore, it was notoriously difficult to obtain specialist advice within working hours. Contact lens (CL) wearers are prone to Pseudomonas conjunctivitis which requires certain antibiotics and mismanagement of this has led to sight-threatening consequences locally. Junior doctor surveys suggested under-confidence in managing eye problems and initial audit showed that eye assessments are frequently incomplete during ED clerkings. For example, CL status and visual acuity were documented in 63% and 77% of cases respectively; however, these were increased when a dedicated pro forma was used. To address these multiple issues, a new ‘eye examination pro forma’ was created, along with integrated clinical guidelines based on local expert practice. This would prompt staff to elicit key information to help guide management. A new referral pathway was also introduced to facilitate access to ophthalmology services. On re-auditing seven months later, the new pro forma was completed for only 28% of patients, though this was associated with a higher rate of documentation of all parameters. The referral pathways worked efficiently and patients with red flag features were identified and managed more appropriately than before. We learnt that it is important that someone personally drives the innovations from the outset, otherwise prolonged change is difficult. Secondly, junior doctors may not be proficient with slit lamp use, for instance, so targeted teaching is required, not simply new pathways. Full engagement with the pro forma and effective patient management should then improve simultaneously. Specific teaching is now being implemented and permanent staff have been recruited to oversee the project. We plan to re-audit in November 2014. British Publishing Group 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4645851/ /pubmed/26734281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201656.w1962 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Saifuddin, Aamir
Brookes, Rachel
Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title_full Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title_fullStr Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title_short Improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large London Emergency Department
title_sort improving the management of patients with acute red eyes in a large london emergency department
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201656.w1962
work_keys_str_mv AT saifuddinaamir improvingthemanagementofpatientswithacuteredeyesinalargelondonemergencydepartment
AT brookesrachel improvingthemanagementofpatientswithacuteredeyesinalargelondonemergencydepartment