Cargando…
Recognition of the deteriorating patient
Following Sir Bruce Keogh's review of 14 NHS Trusts, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust was found to have higher mortality rates than the England average. As part of a series of implementations and investigations to address this, a quality improvement project looking at clinical responses to the deterio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206777.w2734 |
_version_ | 1782400881347526656 |
---|---|
author | Spiers, Laura Singh Mohal, Jagdeep Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan Greenlee, Hannah Carmichael, Juliet Busher, Rebecca |
author_facet | Spiers, Laura Singh Mohal, Jagdeep Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan Greenlee, Hannah Carmichael, Juliet Busher, Rebecca |
author_sort | Spiers, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following Sir Bruce Keogh's review of 14 NHS Trusts, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust was found to have higher mortality rates than the England average. As part of a series of implementations and investigations to address this, a quality improvement project looking at clinical responses to the deteriorating patients was designed. Buckinghamshire NHS Trust utilises the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) metric for observations and escalation, and this was the standard used for the project. Episodes were eligible for inclusion if the NEWS score was increased to 5 or above. Data was collected by junior doctors from acute wards across the trust using notes and charts available. The initial cycle identified that in 57% of cases the high NEWS was escalated for review. Only half of cases were reviewed by a doctor; only a third were reviewed within an hour. In only 20% of cases were all criteria of the NEWS guidelines met. The first intervention was through education. After this, the project was completed on a monthly basis for 6 months with additional interventions introduced, including increased medical staff availability, grand round presentations, and increased outreach provision. Over this 6 month period, there was an increase to 87% of cases being reviewed by a doctor of appropriate seniority. Whilst this is a surrogate for reducing mortality and improving the clinical care given in the hospital, these results suggest successful interventions for improving clinical response to deteriorating patients across the trust. The project has recruited a new cohort of juniors to continue the quality improvement cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46458612016-01-05 Recognition of the deteriorating patient Spiers, Laura Singh Mohal, Jagdeep Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan Greenlee, Hannah Carmichael, Juliet Busher, Rebecca BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Following Sir Bruce Keogh's review of 14 NHS Trusts, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust was found to have higher mortality rates than the England average. As part of a series of implementations and investigations to address this, a quality improvement project looking at clinical responses to the deteriorating patients was designed. Buckinghamshire NHS Trust utilises the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) metric for observations and escalation, and this was the standard used for the project. Episodes were eligible for inclusion if the NEWS score was increased to 5 or above. Data was collected by junior doctors from acute wards across the trust using notes and charts available. The initial cycle identified that in 57% of cases the high NEWS was escalated for review. Only half of cases were reviewed by a doctor; only a third were reviewed within an hour. In only 20% of cases were all criteria of the NEWS guidelines met. The first intervention was through education. After this, the project was completed on a monthly basis for 6 months with additional interventions introduced, including increased medical staff availability, grand round presentations, and increased outreach provision. Over this 6 month period, there was an increase to 87% of cases being reviewed by a doctor of appropriate seniority. Whilst this is a surrogate for reducing mortality and improving the clinical care given in the hospital, these results suggest successful interventions for improving clinical response to deteriorating patients across the trust. The project has recruited a new cohort of juniors to continue the quality improvement cycle. British Publishing Group 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4645861/ /pubmed/26734344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206777.w2734 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Spiers, Laura Singh Mohal, Jagdeep Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan Greenlee, Hannah Carmichael, Juliet Busher, Rebecca Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title | Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title_full | Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title_fullStr | Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title_short | Recognition of the deteriorating patient |
title_sort | recognition of the deteriorating patient |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206777.w2734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spierslaura recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient AT singhmohaljagdeep recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient AT pearsonstuttardjonathan recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient AT greenleehannah recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient AT carmichaeljuliet recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient AT busherrebecca recognitionofthedeterioratingpatient |