Cargando…
Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST!
Malnutrition affects over three million people in the UK with associated health costs exceeding £13 billion annually.[1] In hospital, malnutrition has been shown to increase complication rates, morbidity, mortality, hospital readmissions, and length of hospital stay.[2] To screen for malnutrition, a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204810.w2031 |
_version_ | 1782400883586236416 |
---|---|
author | Frank, Madeleine Sivagnanaratnam, Aravinth Bernstein, Jo |
author_facet | Frank, Madeleine Sivagnanaratnam, Aravinth Bernstein, Jo |
author_sort | Frank, Madeleine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malnutrition affects over three million people in the UK with associated health costs exceeding £13 billion annually.[1] In hospital, malnutrition has been shown to increase complication rates, morbidity, mortality, hospital readmissions, and length of hospital stay.[2] To screen for malnutrition, a reliable and validated screening tool such as the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) should be used.[3] We believe that improved patient outcomes and significant savings to the trust can be achieved, not only by ensuring that every patient has a MUST score documented, but that it is calculated correctly and the appropriate interventions are implemented. We have carried out the audit three times (May, July, and November 2013). The study included the patients on the elderly care ward of Watford General Hospital (n=64, 62, and 63 respectively). MUST scores documented in nursing notes for each patient were noted. We re-calculated each MUST score ourselves for comparison. We went through patient notes and nursing information and noted which recommended nutritional interventions were being implemented. Our results highlighted several issues: 1) Patients did not consistently have a MUST score documented 2) MUST scores were calculated incorrectly. This was generally due to BMIs calculated incorrectly, and patients’ weights from six months ago not being known 3) High MUST scores not being acted on appropriately. Our interventions have involved liaising with various teams within the hospital to maximise the efficacy of the MUST score. This has included encouraging the trust to provide regular training to nurses because of high nursing staff turnover. Following our audit, the dietitian department agreed to undertake weekly ward rounds to screen for patients at risk of malnutrition. Our interventions so far have resulted in increased proportion of MUST scores being calculated (73 to 97%), and increased rates of patients being referred to dietitians (62 to 86% in the second audit cycle). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46458722016-01-05 Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! Frank, Madeleine Sivagnanaratnam, Aravinth Bernstein, Jo BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Malnutrition affects over three million people in the UK with associated health costs exceeding £13 billion annually.[1] In hospital, malnutrition has been shown to increase complication rates, morbidity, mortality, hospital readmissions, and length of hospital stay.[2] To screen for malnutrition, a reliable and validated screening tool such as the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) should be used.[3] We believe that improved patient outcomes and significant savings to the trust can be achieved, not only by ensuring that every patient has a MUST score documented, but that it is calculated correctly and the appropriate interventions are implemented. We have carried out the audit three times (May, July, and November 2013). The study included the patients on the elderly care ward of Watford General Hospital (n=64, 62, and 63 respectively). MUST scores documented in nursing notes for each patient were noted. We re-calculated each MUST score ourselves for comparison. We went through patient notes and nursing information and noted which recommended nutritional interventions were being implemented. Our results highlighted several issues: 1) Patients did not consistently have a MUST score documented 2) MUST scores were calculated incorrectly. This was generally due to BMIs calculated incorrectly, and patients’ weights from six months ago not being known 3) High MUST scores not being acted on appropriately. Our interventions have involved liaising with various teams within the hospital to maximise the efficacy of the MUST score. This has included encouraging the trust to provide regular training to nurses because of high nursing staff turnover. Following our audit, the dietitian department agreed to undertake weekly ward rounds to screen for patients at risk of malnutrition. Our interventions so far have resulted in increased proportion of MUST scores being calculated (73 to 97%), and increased rates of patients being referred to dietitians (62 to 86% in the second audit cycle). British Publishing Group 2015-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4645872/ /pubmed/26734346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204810.w2031 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Frank, Madeleine Sivagnanaratnam, Aravinth Bernstein, Jo Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title | Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title_full | Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title_fullStr | Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title_short | Nutritional assessment in elderly care: a MUST! |
title_sort | nutritional assessment in elderly care: a must! |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204810.w2031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankmadeleine nutritionalassessmentinelderlycareamust AT sivagnanaratnamaravinth nutritionalassessmentinelderlycareamust AT bernsteinjo nutritionalassessmentinelderlycareamust |