Cargando…

First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation

First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a well established and successful treatment; however there still remains controversy over the best choice of construct. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing first metatarsalphalangeal fusion over eighteen months (n=52) using either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, M.A, Parnell, M, Khan, W.S, Khan, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010480
_version_ 1782400888935022592
author Rashid, M.A
Parnell, M
Khan, W.S
Khan, A
author_facet Rashid, M.A
Parnell, M
Khan, W.S
Khan, A
author_sort Rashid, M.A
collection PubMed
description First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a well established and successful treatment; however there still remains controversy over the best choice of construct. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing first metatarsalphalangeal fusion over eighteen months (n=52) using either dorsal non-locking plate with additional compression lag screw fixation or dorsal non-locking plate alone. We found when assessing clinical criteria, patients with dorsal non-locking plates and additional compression lag screw fixation had a significantly higher rate of fusion (100% vs 77.8%), significantly higher rate of fusion within the first two months (55.6% vs 83.3%), significantly earlier time to fusion (52.2 days vs 75.6 days), and significantly lower rate of non-union (0% vs 22.2%). When blindly assessing radiographic criteria, the patients treated with the plate and compression screw had a significantly higher rate of fusion and lower rate of non-union (0% vs 33%). There was no statistically significant difference between the frequencies of complications in the groups. We believe that the interfragmentary compression is a crucial factor in achieving good union rates and recommend the use of non-locking pre-contoured plating with additional interfragmentary compression screw as the fixation method of choice for these procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46458952015-11-19 First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation Rashid, M.A Parnell, M Khan, W.S Khan, A Open Orthop J Article First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a well established and successful treatment; however there still remains controversy over the best choice of construct. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing first metatarsalphalangeal fusion over eighteen months (n=52) using either dorsal non-locking plate with additional compression lag screw fixation or dorsal non-locking plate alone. We found when assessing clinical criteria, patients with dorsal non-locking plates and additional compression lag screw fixation had a significantly higher rate of fusion (100% vs 77.8%), significantly higher rate of fusion within the first two months (55.6% vs 83.3%), significantly earlier time to fusion (52.2 days vs 75.6 days), and significantly lower rate of non-union (0% vs 22.2%). When blindly assessing radiographic criteria, the patients treated with the plate and compression screw had a significantly higher rate of fusion and lower rate of non-union (0% vs 33%). There was no statistically significant difference between the frequencies of complications in the groups. We believe that the interfragmentary compression is a crucial factor in achieving good union rates and recommend the use of non-locking pre-contoured plating with additional interfragmentary compression screw as the fixation method of choice for these procedures. Bentham Open 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4645895/ /pubmed/26587065 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010480 Text en © Rashid et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Rashid, M.A
Parnell, M
Khan, W.S
Khan, A
First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title_full First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title_fullStr First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title_full_unstemmed First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title_short First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation
title_sort first metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis: a retrospective comparison of two methods of fixation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010480
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidma firstmetatarsalphalangealjointarthrodesisaretrospectivecomparisonoftwomethodsoffixation
AT parnellm firstmetatarsalphalangealjointarthrodesisaretrospectivecomparisonoftwomethodsoffixation
AT khanws firstmetatarsalphalangealjointarthrodesisaretrospectivecomparisonoftwomethodsoffixation
AT khana firstmetatarsalphalangealjointarthrodesisaretrospectivecomparisonoftwomethodsoffixation