Cargando…
A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes
Residents in care homes are more likely to be prescribed multiple medicines yet often have little involvement in these prescribing decisions. Reviewing and stopping inappropriate medicines is not currently adopted across the health economy. This Health Foundation funded Shine project developed a pra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203261.w2538 |
_version_ | 1782400897822752768 |
---|---|
author | Baqir, Wasim Barrett, Steven Desai, Nisha Copeland, Richard Hughes, Julian |
author_facet | Baqir, Wasim Barrett, Steven Desai, Nisha Copeland, Richard Hughes, Julian |
author_sort | Baqir, Wasim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Residents in care homes are more likely to be prescribed multiple medicines yet often have little involvement in these prescribing decisions. Reviewing and stopping inappropriate medicines is not currently adopted across the health economy. This Health Foundation funded Shine project developed a pragmatic approach to optimising medicines in care homes while involving all residents in decision making. The pharmacist undertook a detailed medication review using primary care records. The results were discussed at a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting involving the care home nurse and the resident's general practitioner (GP), with input from the local psychiatry of old age service (POAS) where appropriate. Suggestions for medicines which should be stopped, changed or started, and other interventions (eg monitoring) were discussed with the resident and/or their family. Over 12 months 422 residents were reviewed, and 1346 interventions were made in 91% of residents reviewed with 15 different types of interventions. The most common intervention (52.3%) was to stop medicines; 704 medicines stopped in 298 residents (70.6%). On average, 1.7 medicines were stopped for every resident reviewed (range zero to nine medicines; SD=1.7), with a 17.4% reduction in medicines prescribed (3602 medicines prescribed before and 2975 after review). The main reasons for stopping medicines were: no current indication (401 medicines; 57%), resident not wanting medicine after risks and benefits were explained (120 medicines; 17%), and safety concerns (42 medicines; 6%). The net annualised savings against the medicines budget were £77,703 or £184 per person reviewed. The cost of delivering the intervention was £32,670 (pharmacist, GP, POAS consultant, and care home nurse time) for 422 residents; for every £1 invested, £2.38 could be released from the medicines budget. This project demonstrated that a multidisciplinary medication review with a pharmacist, doctor, and care home nurse can safely reduce inappropriate medication in elderly care home residents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46459342016-01-05 A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes Baqir, Wasim Barrett, Steven Desai, Nisha Copeland, Richard Hughes, Julian BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Residents in care homes are more likely to be prescribed multiple medicines yet often have little involvement in these prescribing decisions. Reviewing and stopping inappropriate medicines is not currently adopted across the health economy. This Health Foundation funded Shine project developed a pragmatic approach to optimising medicines in care homes while involving all residents in decision making. The pharmacist undertook a detailed medication review using primary care records. The results were discussed at a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting involving the care home nurse and the resident's general practitioner (GP), with input from the local psychiatry of old age service (POAS) where appropriate. Suggestions for medicines which should be stopped, changed or started, and other interventions (eg monitoring) were discussed with the resident and/or their family. Over 12 months 422 residents were reviewed, and 1346 interventions were made in 91% of residents reviewed with 15 different types of interventions. The most common intervention (52.3%) was to stop medicines; 704 medicines stopped in 298 residents (70.6%). On average, 1.7 medicines were stopped for every resident reviewed (range zero to nine medicines; SD=1.7), with a 17.4% reduction in medicines prescribed (3602 medicines prescribed before and 2975 after review). The main reasons for stopping medicines were: no current indication (401 medicines; 57%), resident not wanting medicine after risks and benefits were explained (120 medicines; 17%), and safety concerns (42 medicines; 6%). The net annualised savings against the medicines budget were £77,703 or £184 per person reviewed. The cost of delivering the intervention was £32,670 (pharmacist, GP, POAS consultant, and care home nurse time) for 422 residents; for every £1 invested, £2.38 could be released from the medicines budget. This project demonstrated that a multidisciplinary medication review with a pharmacist, doctor, and care home nurse can safely reduce inappropriate medication in elderly care home residents. British Publishing Group 2014-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4645934/ /pubmed/26734305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203261.w2538 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Baqir, Wasim Barrett, Steven Desai, Nisha Copeland, Richard Hughes, Julian A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title | A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title_full | A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title_fullStr | A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title_short | A clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
title_sort | clinico-ethical framework for multidisciplinary review of medication in nursing homes |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u203261.w2538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baqirwasim aclinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT barrettsteven aclinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT desainisha aclinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT copelandrichard aclinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT hughesjulian aclinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT baqirwasim clinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT barrettsteven clinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT desainisha clinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT copelandrichard clinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes AT hughesjulian clinicoethicalframeworkformultidisciplinaryreviewofmedicationinnursinghomes |