Cargando…

Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia

Care bundles promote delivery of effective care and improve patient outcomes. The understanding of how to improve delivery of care bundles is incomplete. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme is a national collaborative with the aim of improving the delivery of care to patients in acute hospitals in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, Malcolm, Booth, Malcolm, Ellis, Kirsteen, Maher, Shaun, Longmate, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207660.w3069
_version_ 1782400898987720704
author Daniel, Malcolm
Booth, Malcolm
Ellis, Kirsteen
Maher, Shaun
Longmate, Andrew
author_facet Daniel, Malcolm
Booth, Malcolm
Ellis, Kirsteen
Maher, Shaun
Longmate, Andrew
author_sort Daniel, Malcolm
collection PubMed
description Care bundles promote delivery of effective care and improve patient outcomes. The understanding of how to improve delivery of care bundles is incomplete. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme is a national collaborative with the aim of improving the delivery of care to patients in acute hospitals in Scotland. Critical care is one of five workstreams in the programme. A programme goal is to reduce incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) to zero or 300 calendar days between events through use of a VAP Prevention bundle. We studied two ICUs participating in this programme. Each ICU had established infection surveillance system prior to the programme starting. Both units had an appreciable incidence of VAP. Initial VAP prevention bundle adherence was low in each ICU (35% and 41%). Comparing time periods before and after 80% bundle VAP prevention bundle adherence was achieved showed a similar reduction in VAP incidence (from 6.9 to 1.0, and from 7.8 to 1.4/1000 ventilation days). When compared each ICU used common and contrasting approaches to accomplish this improvement. We describe the five improvement knowledge systems used to improve bundle adherence to bundle elements in each hospital. The insights gained from these front-line clinical teams can be used as a template for improvement efforts in a variety of other healthcare settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4645939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46459392016-01-05 Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia Daniel, Malcolm Booth, Malcolm Ellis, Kirsteen Maher, Shaun Longmate, Andrew BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Care bundles promote delivery of effective care and improve patient outcomes. The understanding of how to improve delivery of care bundles is incomplete. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme is a national collaborative with the aim of improving the delivery of care to patients in acute hospitals in Scotland. Critical care is one of five workstreams in the programme. A programme goal is to reduce incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) to zero or 300 calendar days between events through use of a VAP Prevention bundle. We studied two ICUs participating in this programme. Each ICU had established infection surveillance system prior to the programme starting. Both units had an appreciable incidence of VAP. Initial VAP prevention bundle adherence was low in each ICU (35% and 41%). Comparing time periods before and after 80% bundle VAP prevention bundle adherence was achieved showed a similar reduction in VAP incidence (from 6.9 to 1.0, and from 7.8 to 1.4/1000 ventilation days). When compared each ICU used common and contrasting approaches to accomplish this improvement. We describe the five improvement knowledge systems used to improve bundle adherence to bundle elements in each hospital. The insights gained from these front-line clinical teams can be used as a template for improvement efforts in a variety of other healthcare settings. British Publishing Group 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4645939/ /pubmed/26734371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207660.w3069 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Daniel, Malcolm
Booth, Malcolm
Ellis, Kirsteen
Maher, Shaun
Longmate, Andrew
Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title_full Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title_fullStr Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title_short Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
title_sort details behind the dots: how different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207660.w3069
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmalcolm detailsbehindthedotshowdifferentintensivecareunitsusedcommonandcontrastingmethodstopreventventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT boothmalcolm detailsbehindthedotshowdifferentintensivecareunitsusedcommonandcontrastingmethodstopreventventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT elliskirsteen detailsbehindthedotshowdifferentintensivecareunitsusedcommonandcontrastingmethodstopreventventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT mahershaun detailsbehindthedotshowdifferentintensivecareunitsusedcommonandcontrastingmethodstopreventventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT longmateandrew detailsbehindthedotshowdifferentintensivecareunitsusedcommonandcontrastingmethodstopreventventilatorassociatedpneumonia