Cargando…

Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions

OBJECTIVES: Pain is often poorly managed, highlighting the need to better understand and treat patients’ pain. Research suggests that pain is assessed and treated differently depending on patient sex, race, and/or age. Perspective-taking, whereby one envisions the perspective of another, has been fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wandner, Laura D, Torres, Calia A, Bartley, Emily J, George, Steven Z, Robinson, Michael E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635483
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S88033
_version_ 1782400955024670720
author Wandner, Laura D
Torres, Calia A
Bartley, Emily J
George, Steven Z
Robinson, Michael E
author_facet Wandner, Laura D
Torres, Calia A
Bartley, Emily J
George, Steven Z
Robinson, Michael E
author_sort Wandner, Laura D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pain is often poorly managed, highlighting the need to better understand and treat patients’ pain. Research suggests that pain is assessed and treated differently depending on patient sex, race, and/or age. Perspective-taking, whereby one envisions the perspective of another, has been found to reduce racial disparities in pain management. This study used virtual human (VH) technology to examine whether a perspective-taking intervention impacts pain management decisions. METHODS: Ninety-six participants were randomized to an online treatment or control group and viewed 16 video clips of VHs with standardized levels of pain. Participants provided ratings on the VHs’ pain intensity and their willingness to administer opioids to them. The intervention group received a brief perspective-taking intervention that consisted of having participants imagine how the patient’s suffering could affect his/her life, whereas the control group was asked to wait for the next VH videos to load. A LENS model analysis was used to investigate both group level (nomothetic) and individual level (idiographic) decision policies. A LENS model of analysis is typically used as an analog method for capturing how groups of people and individuals use information in their environment to form judgments. RESULTS: Nomothetic results found that participants rated pain higher and were more likely to prescribe opioids to VHs postintervention, irrespective of group. Idiographic results, however, found that the use of cues to make pain management decisions was mitigated by the perspective-taking group. The participants in the perspective-taking group were more likely to think about pain and the patients’ perspective during the intervention, while control participants were more likely to reflect on the VHs’ sex, race, or age. CONCLUSION: A brief intervention may alter participants’ pain management decisions. These results indicate that a brief intervention might be an initial step toward aligning observers’ pain management ratings with those of the patient. Future research is needed to replicate findings in a health care population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4646582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46465822015-12-03 Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions Wandner, Laura D Torres, Calia A Bartley, Emily J George, Steven Z Robinson, Michael E J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVES: Pain is often poorly managed, highlighting the need to better understand and treat patients’ pain. Research suggests that pain is assessed and treated differently depending on patient sex, race, and/or age. Perspective-taking, whereby one envisions the perspective of another, has been found to reduce racial disparities in pain management. This study used virtual human (VH) technology to examine whether a perspective-taking intervention impacts pain management decisions. METHODS: Ninety-six participants were randomized to an online treatment or control group and viewed 16 video clips of VHs with standardized levels of pain. Participants provided ratings on the VHs’ pain intensity and their willingness to administer opioids to them. The intervention group received a brief perspective-taking intervention that consisted of having participants imagine how the patient’s suffering could affect his/her life, whereas the control group was asked to wait for the next VH videos to load. A LENS model analysis was used to investigate both group level (nomothetic) and individual level (idiographic) decision policies. A LENS model of analysis is typically used as an analog method for capturing how groups of people and individuals use information in their environment to form judgments. RESULTS: Nomothetic results found that participants rated pain higher and were more likely to prescribe opioids to VHs postintervention, irrespective of group. Idiographic results, however, found that the use of cues to make pain management decisions was mitigated by the perspective-taking group. The participants in the perspective-taking group were more likely to think about pain and the patients’ perspective during the intervention, while control participants were more likely to reflect on the VHs’ sex, race, or age. CONCLUSION: A brief intervention may alter participants’ pain management decisions. These results indicate that a brief intervention might be an initial step toward aligning observers’ pain management ratings with those of the patient. Future research is needed to replicate findings in a health care population. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4646582/ /pubmed/26635483 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S88033 Text en © 2015 Wandner et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wandner, Laura D
Torres, Calia A
Bartley, Emily J
George, Steven Z
Robinson, Michael E
Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title_full Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title_fullStr Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title_short Effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
title_sort effect of a perspective-taking intervention on the consideration of pain assessment and treatment decisions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635483
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S88033
work_keys_str_mv AT wandnerlaurad effectofaperspectivetakinginterventionontheconsiderationofpainassessmentandtreatmentdecisions
AT torrescaliaa effectofaperspectivetakinginterventionontheconsiderationofpainassessmentandtreatmentdecisions
AT bartleyemilyj effectofaperspectivetakinginterventionontheconsiderationofpainassessmentandtreatmentdecisions
AT georgestevenz effectofaperspectivetakinginterventionontheconsiderationofpainassessmentandtreatmentdecisions
AT robinsonmichaele effectofaperspectivetakinginterventionontheconsiderationofpainassessmentandtreatmentdecisions