Cargando…
Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary te...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26139038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4 |
_version_ | 1782401002007166976 |
---|---|
author | Alexander, David M. Trengove, Chris van Leeuwen, Cees |
author_facet | Alexander, David M. Trengove, Chris van Leeuwen, Cees |
author_sort | Alexander, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary techniques for analyzing fMRI and EEG/MEG data. We describe the assumption and how it licenses common methods in cognitive neuroscience; in particular, we show how it plays out in signal differencing and averaging, and how it misleads us into seeing the brain as a set of static activity sources. In fact, rather than being static, the domains of cortical activity change from moment to moment: Recent research has suggested the importance of traveling waves of activation in the cortex. Traveling waves have been described at a range of different spatial scales in the cortex; they explain a large proportion of the variance in phase measurements of EEG, MEG and ECoG, and are important for understanding cortical function. Critically, traveling waves are not space–time separable. Their prominence suggests that the correct frame of reference for analyzing cortical activity is the dynamical trajectory of the system, rather than the time and space coordinates of measurements. We illustrate what the failure of space–time separability implies for cortical activation, and what consequences this should have for cognitive neuroscience. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4646933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46469332015-11-23 Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience Alexander, David M. Trengove, Chris van Leeuwen, Cees Cogn Process Research Report An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary techniques for analyzing fMRI and EEG/MEG data. We describe the assumption and how it licenses common methods in cognitive neuroscience; in particular, we show how it plays out in signal differencing and averaging, and how it misleads us into seeing the brain as a set of static activity sources. In fact, rather than being static, the domains of cortical activity change from moment to moment: Recent research has suggested the importance of traveling waves of activation in the cortex. Traveling waves have been described at a range of different spatial scales in the cortex; they explain a large proportion of the variance in phase measurements of EEG, MEG and ECoG, and are important for understanding cortical function. Critically, traveling waves are not space–time separable. Their prominence suggests that the correct frame of reference for analyzing cortical activity is the dynamical trajectory of the system, rather than the time and space coordinates of measurements. We illustrate what the failure of space–time separability implies for cortical activation, and what consequences this should have for cognitive neuroscience. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-03 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4646933/ /pubmed/26139038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Report Alexander, David M. Trengove, Chris van Leeuwen, Cees Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title | Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title_full | Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title_fullStr | Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title_short | Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
title_sort | donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience |
topic | Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26139038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderdavidm dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience AT trengovechris dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience AT vanleeuwencees dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience |