Cargando…

Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience

An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, David M., Trengove, Chris, van Leeuwen, Cees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26139038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4
_version_ 1782401002007166976
author Alexander, David M.
Trengove, Chris
van Leeuwen, Cees
author_facet Alexander, David M.
Trengove, Chris
van Leeuwen, Cees
author_sort Alexander, David M.
collection PubMed
description An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary techniques for analyzing fMRI and EEG/MEG data. We describe the assumption and how it licenses common methods in cognitive neuroscience; in particular, we show how it plays out in signal differencing and averaging, and how it misleads us into seeing the brain as a set of static activity sources. In fact, rather than being static, the domains of cortical activity change from moment to moment: Recent research has suggested the importance of traveling waves of activation in the cortex. Traveling waves have been described at a range of different spatial scales in the cortex; they explain a large proportion of the variance in phase measurements of EEG, MEG and ECoG, and are important for understanding cortical function. Critically, traveling waves are not space–time separable. Their prominence suggests that the correct frame of reference for analyzing cortical activity is the dynamical trajectory of the system, rather than the time and space coordinates of measurements. We illustrate what the failure of space–time separability implies for cortical activation, and what consequences this should have for cognitive neuroscience. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4646933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46469332015-11-23 Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience Alexander, David M. Trengove, Chris van Leeuwen, Cees Cogn Process Research Report An assumption nearly all researchers in cognitive neuroscience tacitly adhere to is that of space–time separability. Historically, it forms the basis of Donders’ difference method, and to date, it underwrites all difference imaging and trial-averaging of cortical activity, including the customary techniques for analyzing fMRI and EEG/MEG data. We describe the assumption and how it licenses common methods in cognitive neuroscience; in particular, we show how it plays out in signal differencing and averaging, and how it misleads us into seeing the brain as a set of static activity sources. In fact, rather than being static, the domains of cortical activity change from moment to moment: Recent research has suggested the importance of traveling waves of activation in the cortex. Traveling waves have been described at a range of different spatial scales in the cortex; they explain a large proportion of the variance in phase measurements of EEG, MEG and ECoG, and are important for understanding cortical function. Critically, traveling waves are not space–time separable. Their prominence suggests that the correct frame of reference for analyzing cortical activity is the dynamical trajectory of the system, rather than the time and space coordinates of measurements. We illustrate what the failure of space–time separability implies for cortical activation, and what consequences this should have for cognitive neuroscience. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-03 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4646933/ /pubmed/26139038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Report
Alexander, David M.
Trengove, Chris
van Leeuwen, Cees
Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title_full Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title_fullStr Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title_short Donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
title_sort donders is dead: cortical traveling waves and the limits of mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26139038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0662-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderdavidm dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience
AT trengovechris dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience
AT vanleeuwencees dondersisdeadcorticaltravelingwavesandthelimitsofmentalchronometryincognitiveneuroscience