Cargando…

Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite

Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jadhav, Anendd, Mundada, Bhushan, Deshmukh, Rahul, Bhutekar, Umesh, Kala, Atul, Waghwani, Kapil, Mishra, Apoorva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/954314
_version_ 1782401022157651968
author Jadhav, Anendd
Mundada, Bhushan
Deshmukh, Rahul
Bhutekar, Umesh
Kala, Atul
Waghwani, Kapil
Mishra, Apoorva
author_facet Jadhav, Anendd
Mundada, Bhushan
Deshmukh, Rahul
Bhutekar, Umesh
Kala, Atul
Waghwani, Kapil
Mishra, Apoorva
author_sort Jadhav, Anendd
collection PubMed
description Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables analysed were age, sex, cause of injury, pretreatment occlusion, treatment given, period of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), and posttreatment occlusion. Results. Out of 388 mandibular fractures treated, ramus fractures were 12 (3.09%). In the present study, predominant cause of mandibular ramus fracture was road traffic accident (RTA) n = 07 (58.33%) followed by fall n = 04 (33.33%) and assault n = 1 (8.33%). The average age was 35.9 years with a male predilection. Of these, 9 patients were treated with ORIF while remaining 3 with closed treatment. The average MMF after closed treatment was 21 days and 3 to 5 days after ORIF. There was improvement in occlusion in all 12 patients posttreatment with no major complication except for reduced mouth opening in cases treated with ORIF which recovered with physiotherapy and muscle relaxants. Conclusion. Mandibular ramus fractures accounted for 3.09% with RTA as a common aetiology. ORIF of ramus fractures facilitated adequate functional and anatomic reduction with early return of function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4647056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46470562015-11-26 Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite Jadhav, Anendd Mundada, Bhushan Deshmukh, Rahul Bhutekar, Umesh Kala, Atul Waghwani, Kapil Mishra, Apoorva Plast Surg Int Clinical Study Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables analysed were age, sex, cause of injury, pretreatment occlusion, treatment given, period of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), and posttreatment occlusion. Results. Out of 388 mandibular fractures treated, ramus fractures were 12 (3.09%). In the present study, predominant cause of mandibular ramus fracture was road traffic accident (RTA) n = 07 (58.33%) followed by fall n = 04 (33.33%) and assault n = 1 (8.33%). The average age was 35.9 years with a male predilection. Of these, 9 patients were treated with ORIF while remaining 3 with closed treatment. The average MMF after closed treatment was 21 days and 3 to 5 days after ORIF. There was improvement in occlusion in all 12 patients posttreatment with no major complication except for reduced mouth opening in cases treated with ORIF which recovered with physiotherapy and muscle relaxants. Conclusion. Mandibular ramus fractures accounted for 3.09% with RTA as a common aetiology. ORIF of ramus fractures facilitated adequate functional and anatomic reduction with early return of function. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4647056/ /pubmed/26613050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/954314 Text en Copyright © 2015 Anendd Jadhav et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Jadhav, Anendd
Mundada, Bhushan
Deshmukh, Rahul
Bhutekar, Umesh
Kala, Atul
Waghwani, Kapil
Mishra, Apoorva
Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title_full Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title_fullStr Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title_short Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
title_sort mandibular ramus fracture: an overview of rare anatomical subsite
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/954314
work_keys_str_mv AT jadhavanendd mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT mundadabhushan mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT deshmukhrahul mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT bhutekarumesh mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT kalaatul mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT waghwanikapil mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite
AT mishraapoorva mandibularramusfractureanoverviewofrareanatomicalsubsite