Cargando…

Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or bom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Amber L., Rzotkiewicz, Amanda, Zwickle, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4
_version_ 1782401068212158464
author Pearson, Amber L.
Rzotkiewicz, Amanda
Zwickle, Adam
author_facet Pearson, Amber L.
Rzotkiewicz, Amanda
Zwickle, Adam
author_sort Pearson, Amber L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or boma (compound) in Naitolia, Tanzania using a ‘placemark’ in Google Earth Pro (version 7.1.2.2041). Next, a local expert assisted in removing misclassified placemarks. A random sample was then selected using a random number generator. The random sample points were mapped and used by survey enumerators to navigate. RESULTS: We created a spatial sample frame and a random sample in 34.5 student working hours, 3 local expert hours and 1.5 academic working hours. Challenges included determining whether homes were occupied or abandoned, developing a protocol for placemark inclusion and quality issues with the aerial imagery itself. In the field, 175 sample points were visited and 170 of these (97 %) were actual households. The primary advantages of this method were the: (a) ability to generate a robust random sample in a rural and remote area; (b) lack of reliance on existing, external population data sources; and (c) relatively low levels of funding and time required. CONCLUSIONS: This method to develop a spatial sample frame was efficient and cost-effective when compared to in-field generation of a household inventory or GPS tracking of households. Utilizing a local expert to review the sample frame prior to field testing greatly increased accuracy. Overall, this method is a promising alternative to expensive and possibly biased household inventories or in-field GPS data collection for all households.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4647289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46472892015-11-18 Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system Pearson, Amber L. Rzotkiewicz, Amanda Zwickle, Adam Int J Health Geogr Methodology BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or boma (compound) in Naitolia, Tanzania using a ‘placemark’ in Google Earth Pro (version 7.1.2.2041). Next, a local expert assisted in removing misclassified placemarks. A random sample was then selected using a random number generator. The random sample points were mapped and used by survey enumerators to navigate. RESULTS: We created a spatial sample frame and a random sample in 34.5 student working hours, 3 local expert hours and 1.5 academic working hours. Challenges included determining whether homes were occupied or abandoned, developing a protocol for placemark inclusion and quality issues with the aerial imagery itself. In the field, 175 sample points were visited and 170 of these (97 %) were actual households. The primary advantages of this method were the: (a) ability to generate a robust random sample in a rural and remote area; (b) lack of reliance on existing, external population data sources; and (c) relatively low levels of funding and time required. CONCLUSIONS: This method to develop a spatial sample frame was efficient and cost-effective when compared to in-field generation of a household inventory or GPS tracking of households. Utilizing a local expert to review the sample frame prior to field testing greatly increased accuracy. Overall, this method is a promising alternative to expensive and possibly biased household inventories or in-field GPS data collection for all households. BioMed Central 2015-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4647289/ /pubmed/26572873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4 Text en © Pearson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Pearson, Amber L.
Rzotkiewicz, Amanda
Zwickle, Adam
Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title_full Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title_fullStr Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title_full_unstemmed Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title_short Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
title_sort using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonamberl usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem
AT rzotkiewiczamanda usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem
AT zwickleadam usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem