Cargando…
Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system
BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or bom...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4 |
_version_ | 1782401068212158464 |
---|---|
author | Pearson, Amber L. Rzotkiewicz, Amanda Zwickle, Adam |
author_facet | Pearson, Amber L. Rzotkiewicz, Amanda Zwickle, Adam |
author_sort | Pearson, Amber L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or boma (compound) in Naitolia, Tanzania using a ‘placemark’ in Google Earth Pro (version 7.1.2.2041). Next, a local expert assisted in removing misclassified placemarks. A random sample was then selected using a random number generator. The random sample points were mapped and used by survey enumerators to navigate. RESULTS: We created a spatial sample frame and a random sample in 34.5 student working hours, 3 local expert hours and 1.5 academic working hours. Challenges included determining whether homes were occupied or abandoned, developing a protocol for placemark inclusion and quality issues with the aerial imagery itself. In the field, 175 sample points were visited and 170 of these (97 %) were actual households. The primary advantages of this method were the: (a) ability to generate a robust random sample in a rural and remote area; (b) lack of reliance on existing, external population data sources; and (c) relatively low levels of funding and time required. CONCLUSIONS: This method to develop a spatial sample frame was efficient and cost-effective when compared to in-field generation of a household inventory or GPS tracking of households. Utilizing a local expert to review the sample frame prior to field testing greatly increased accuracy. Overall, this method is a promising alternative to expensive and possibly biased household inventories or in-field GPS data collection for all households. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4647289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46472892015-11-18 Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system Pearson, Amber L. Rzotkiewicz, Amanda Zwickle, Adam Int J Health Geogr Methodology BACKGROUND: Obtaining a random household sample can be expensive and challenging. In a dispersed community of semi-nomadic households in rural Tanzania, this study aimed to test an alternative method utilizing freely available aerial imagery. METHODS: We pinned every single-standing structure or boma (compound) in Naitolia, Tanzania using a ‘placemark’ in Google Earth Pro (version 7.1.2.2041). Next, a local expert assisted in removing misclassified placemarks. A random sample was then selected using a random number generator. The random sample points were mapped and used by survey enumerators to navigate. RESULTS: We created a spatial sample frame and a random sample in 34.5 student working hours, 3 local expert hours and 1.5 academic working hours. Challenges included determining whether homes were occupied or abandoned, developing a protocol for placemark inclusion and quality issues with the aerial imagery itself. In the field, 175 sample points were visited and 170 of these (97 %) were actual households. The primary advantages of this method were the: (a) ability to generate a robust random sample in a rural and remote area; (b) lack of reliance on existing, external population data sources; and (c) relatively low levels of funding and time required. CONCLUSIONS: This method to develop a spatial sample frame was efficient and cost-effective when compared to in-field generation of a household inventory or GPS tracking of households. Utilizing a local expert to review the sample frame prior to field testing greatly increased accuracy. Overall, this method is a promising alternative to expensive and possibly biased household inventories or in-field GPS data collection for all households. BioMed Central 2015-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4647289/ /pubmed/26572873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4 Text en © Pearson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Pearson, Amber L. Rzotkiewicz, Amanda Zwickle, Adam Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title | Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title_full | Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title_fullStr | Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title_full_unstemmed | Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title_short | Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
title_sort | using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearsonamberl usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem AT rzotkiewiczamanda usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem AT zwickleadam usingremotespatialtechniquestoselectarandomhouseholdsampleinadispersedseminomadicpastoralcommunityutilityforalongitudinalhealthanddemographicsurveillancesystem |