Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) is a proven malaria control strategy in infants and pregnancy. School-aged children represent 26 % of the African population, and an increasing percentage of them are scholarized. Malaria is causing 50 % of deaths in this age group and malaria cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26574017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0988-5 |
_version_ | 1782401073085939712 |
---|---|
author | Matangila, Junior R. Mitashi, Patrick Inocêncio da Luz, Raquel A. Lutumba, Pascal T. Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre |
author_facet | Matangila, Junior R. Mitashi, Patrick Inocêncio da Luz, Raquel A. Lutumba, Pascal T. Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre |
author_sort | Matangila, Junior R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) is a proven malaria control strategy in infants and pregnancy. School-aged children represent 26 % of the African population, and an increasing percentage of them are scholarized. Malaria is causing 50 % of deaths in this age group and malaria control efforts may shift the malaria burden to older age groups. Schools have been suggested as a platform for health interventions delivery (deworming, iron-folic acid, nutrients supplementation, (boost-)immunization) and as a possible delivery system for IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc). However, the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of IPTsc is limited and the optimal therapeutic regimen remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic search for studies reporting efficacy and safety of IPT in schoolchildren was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials and WHO/ICTRP database, and abstracts from congresses with the following key words: intermittent, preventive treatment AND malaria OR Plasmodium falciparum AND schoolchildren NOT infant NOT pregnancy. RESULTS: Five studies were identified. Most IPTsc regimes demonstrated substantial protection against malaria parasitaemia, with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) given monthly having the highest protective effect (PE) (94 %; 95 % CI 93–96). Contrarily, SP did not provide any PE against parasitaemia. However, no IPT regimen provided a PE above 50 % in regard to anaemia, and highest protection was provided by SP+ amodiaquine (AQ) given four-monthly (50 %; 95 % CI 41–53). The best protection against clinical malaria was observed in children monthly treated with DP (97 %; 95 % CI 87–98). However, there was no protection when the drug was given three-monthly. No severe adverse events were associated with the drugs used for IPTsc. CONCLUSION: IPTsc may reduce the malaria-related burden in schoolchildren. However, more studies assessing efficacy of IPT in particular against malaria-related anaemia and clinical malaria in schoolchildren must be conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4647321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46473212015-11-18 Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review Matangila, Junior R. Mitashi, Patrick Inocêncio da Luz, Raquel A. Lutumba, Pascal T. Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) is a proven malaria control strategy in infants and pregnancy. School-aged children represent 26 % of the African population, and an increasing percentage of them are scholarized. Malaria is causing 50 % of deaths in this age group and malaria control efforts may shift the malaria burden to older age groups. Schools have been suggested as a platform for health interventions delivery (deworming, iron-folic acid, nutrients supplementation, (boost-)immunization) and as a possible delivery system for IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc). However, the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of IPTsc is limited and the optimal therapeutic regimen remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic search for studies reporting efficacy and safety of IPT in schoolchildren was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials and WHO/ICTRP database, and abstracts from congresses with the following key words: intermittent, preventive treatment AND malaria OR Plasmodium falciparum AND schoolchildren NOT infant NOT pregnancy. RESULTS: Five studies were identified. Most IPTsc regimes demonstrated substantial protection against malaria parasitaemia, with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) given monthly having the highest protective effect (PE) (94 %; 95 % CI 93–96). Contrarily, SP did not provide any PE against parasitaemia. However, no IPT regimen provided a PE above 50 % in regard to anaemia, and highest protection was provided by SP+ amodiaquine (AQ) given four-monthly (50 %; 95 % CI 41–53). The best protection against clinical malaria was observed in children monthly treated with DP (97 %; 95 % CI 87–98). However, there was no protection when the drug was given three-monthly. No severe adverse events were associated with the drugs used for IPTsc. CONCLUSION: IPTsc may reduce the malaria-related burden in schoolchildren. However, more studies assessing efficacy of IPT in particular against malaria-related anaemia and clinical malaria in schoolchildren must be conducted. BioMed Central 2015-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4647321/ /pubmed/26574017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0988-5 Text en © Matangila et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Matangila, Junior R. Mitashi, Patrick Inocêncio da Luz, Raquel A. Lutumba, Pascal T. Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title | Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26574017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0988-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matangilajuniorr efficacyandsafetyofintermittentpreventivetreatmentformalariainschoolchildrenasystematicreview AT mitashipatrick efficacyandsafetyofintermittentpreventivetreatmentformalariainschoolchildrenasystematicreview AT inocenciodaluzraquela efficacyandsafetyofintermittentpreventivetreatmentformalariainschoolchildrenasystematicreview AT lutumbapascalt efficacyandsafetyofintermittentpreventivetreatmentformalariainschoolchildrenasystematicreview AT vangeertruydenjeanpierre efficacyandsafetyofintermittentpreventivetreatmentformalariainschoolchildrenasystematicreview |