Cargando…
Best supportive care in clinical trials: review of the inconsistency in control arm design
BACKGROUND: Best supportive care (BSC) as a control arm in clinical trials is poorly defined. We conducted a review to evaluate clinical trials' concordance with published, consensus-based framework for BSC delivery in trials. METHODS: A consensus-based Delphi panel previously identified four k...
Autores principales: | Nipp, R D, Currow, D C, Cherny, N I, Strasser, F, Abernethy, A P, Zafar, S Y |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.192 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The need for a re-evaluation of best supportive care studies reported to date
por: Currow, D C, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The cost of aiming for the best answers: Inconsistent perception
por: Smeets, Jeroen B. J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies‡
por: Higgins, JPT, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Indicators of integration at ESMO Designated Centres of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care
por: Hui, David, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
On Goldilocks, care coordination, and palliative care: making it ‘just right’
por: LeBlanc, Thomas W, et al.
Publicado: (2014)