Cargando…
Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities
The sociotechnical systems perspective offers intriguing and potentially valuable insights into problems associated with workplace safety. While formal sociotechnical systems thinking originated in the 1950s, its application to the analysis and design of sustainable, safe working environments has no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1011241 |
_version_ | 1782401145609650176 |
---|---|
author | Robertson, Michelle M. Hettinger, Lawrence J. Waterson, Patrick E. Ian Noy, Y. Dainoff, Marvin J. Leveson, Nancy G. Carayon, Pascale Courtney, Theodore K. |
author_facet | Robertson, Michelle M. Hettinger, Lawrence J. Waterson, Patrick E. Ian Noy, Y. Dainoff, Marvin J. Leveson, Nancy G. Carayon, Pascale Courtney, Theodore K. |
author_sort | Robertson, Michelle M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sociotechnical systems perspective offers intriguing and potentially valuable insights into problems associated with workplace safety. While formal sociotechnical systems thinking originated in the 1950s, its application to the analysis and design of sustainable, safe working environments has not been fully developed. To that end, a Hopkinton Conference was organised to review and summarise the state of knowledge in the area and to identify research priorities. A group of 26 international experts produced collaborative articles for this special issue of Ergonomics, and each focused on examining a key conceptual, methodological and/or theoretical issue associated with sociotechnical systems and safety. In this concluding paper, we describe the major conference themes and recommendations. These are organised into six topic areas: (1) Concepts, definitions and frameworks, (2) defining research methodologies, (3) modelling and simulation, (4) communications and decision-making, (5) sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe systems and (6) potential future research directions for sociotechnical systems research. Practitioner Summary: Sociotechnical complexity, a characteristic of many contemporary work environments, presents potential safety risks that traditional approaches to workplace safety may not adequately address. In this paper, we summarise the investigations of a group of international researchers into questions associated with the application of sociotechnical systems thinking to improve worker safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4647649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46476492015-12-07 Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities Robertson, Michelle M. Hettinger, Lawrence J. Waterson, Patrick E. Ian Noy, Y. Dainoff, Marvin J. Leveson, Nancy G. Carayon, Pascale Courtney, Theodore K. Ergonomics Articles The sociotechnical systems perspective offers intriguing and potentially valuable insights into problems associated with workplace safety. While formal sociotechnical systems thinking originated in the 1950s, its application to the analysis and design of sustainable, safe working environments has not been fully developed. To that end, a Hopkinton Conference was organised to review and summarise the state of knowledge in the area and to identify research priorities. A group of 26 international experts produced collaborative articles for this special issue of Ergonomics, and each focused on examining a key conceptual, methodological and/or theoretical issue associated with sociotechnical systems and safety. In this concluding paper, we describe the major conference themes and recommendations. These are organised into six topic areas: (1) Concepts, definitions and frameworks, (2) defining research methodologies, (3) modelling and simulation, (4) communications and decision-making, (5) sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe systems and (6) potential future research directions for sociotechnical systems research. Practitioner Summary: Sociotechnical complexity, a characteristic of many contemporary work environments, presents potential safety risks that traditional approaches to workplace safety may not adequately address. In this paper, we summarise the investigations of a group of international researchers into questions associated with the application of sociotechnical systems thinking to improve worker safety. Taylor & Francis 2015-04-03 2015-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4647649/ /pubmed/25728246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1011241 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Robertson, Michelle M. Hettinger, Lawrence J. Waterson, Patrick E. Ian Noy, Y. Dainoff, Marvin J. Leveson, Nancy G. Carayon, Pascale Courtney, Theodore K. Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title | Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title_full | Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title_fullStr | Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title_short | Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities |
title_sort | sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: research needs and opportunities |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1011241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsonmichellem sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT hettingerlawrencej sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT watersonpatricke sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT iannoyy sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT dainoffmarvinj sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT levesonnancyg sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT carayonpascale sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities AT courtneytheodorek sociotechnicalapproachestoworkplacesafetyresearchneedsandopportunities |