Cargando…

Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems

How do communications and decisions impact the safety of sociotechnical systems? This paper frames this question in the context of a dynamic system of nested sub-systems. Communications are related to the construct of observability (i.e. how components integrate information to assess the state with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flach, John M., Carroll, John S., Dainoff, Marvin J., Hamilton, W. Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015621
_version_ 1782401146743160832
author Flach, John M.
Carroll, John S.
Dainoff, Marvin J.
Hamilton, W. Ian
author_facet Flach, John M.
Carroll, John S.
Dainoff, Marvin J.
Hamilton, W. Ian
author_sort Flach, John M.
collection PubMed
description How do communications and decisions impact the safety of sociotechnical systems? This paper frames this question in the context of a dynamic system of nested sub-systems. Communications are related to the construct of observability (i.e. how components integrate information to assess the state with respect to local and global constraints). Decisions are related to the construct of controllability (i.e. how component sub-systems act to meet local and global safety goals). The safety dynamics of sociotechnical systems are evaluated as a function of the coupling between observability and controllability across multiple closed-loop components. Two very different domains (nuclear power and the limited service food industry) provide examples to illustrate how this framework might be applied. While the dynamical systems framework does not offer simple prescriptions for achieving safety, it does provide guides for exploring specific systems to consider the potential fit between organisational structures and work demands, and for generalising across different systems regarding how safety can be managed. Practitioner Summary: While offering no simple prescriptions about how to achieve safety in sociotechnical systems, this paper develops a theoretical framework based on dynamical systems theory as a practical guide for generalising from basic research to work domains and for generalising across alternative work domains to better understand how patterns of communication and decision-making impact system safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4647654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46476542015-12-07 Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems Flach, John M. Carroll, John S. Dainoff, Marvin J. Hamilton, W. Ian Ergonomics Articles How do communications and decisions impact the safety of sociotechnical systems? This paper frames this question in the context of a dynamic system of nested sub-systems. Communications are related to the construct of observability (i.e. how components integrate information to assess the state with respect to local and global constraints). Decisions are related to the construct of controllability (i.e. how component sub-systems act to meet local and global safety goals). The safety dynamics of sociotechnical systems are evaluated as a function of the coupling between observability and controllability across multiple closed-loop components. Two very different domains (nuclear power and the limited service food industry) provide examples to illustrate how this framework might be applied. While the dynamical systems framework does not offer simple prescriptions for achieving safety, it does provide guides for exploring specific systems to consider the potential fit between organisational structures and work demands, and for generalising across different systems regarding how safety can be managed. Practitioner Summary: While offering no simple prescriptions about how to achieve safety in sociotechnical systems, this paper develops a theoretical framework based on dynamical systems theory as a practical guide for generalising from basic research to work domains and for generalising across alternative work domains to better understand how patterns of communication and decision-making impact system safety. Taylor & Francis 2015-04-03 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4647654/ /pubmed/25761155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015621 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Flach, John M.
Carroll, John S.
Dainoff, Marvin J.
Hamilton, W. Ian
Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title_full Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title_fullStr Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title_full_unstemmed Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title_short Striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
title_sort striving for safety: communicating and deciding in sociotechnical systems
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015621
work_keys_str_mv AT flachjohnm strivingforsafetycommunicatinganddecidinginsociotechnicalsystems
AT carrolljohns strivingforsafetycommunicatinganddecidinginsociotechnicalsystems
AT dainoffmarvinj strivingforsafetycommunicatinganddecidinginsociotechnicalsystems
AT hamiltonwian strivingforsafetycommunicatinganddecidinginsociotechnicalsystems