Cargando…

Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is an important process that identifies treatment options and guides disease prognosis. We aimed to assess endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration as an initial investigation technique for patients with suspected lung canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navani, Neal, Nankivell, Matthew, Lawrence, David R, Lock, Sara, Makker, Himender, Baldwin, David R, Stephens, Richard J, Parmar, Mahesh K, Spiro, Stephen G, Morris, Stephen, Janes, Sam M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25660225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6
_version_ 1782401178857897984
author Navani, Neal
Nankivell, Matthew
Lawrence, David R
Lock, Sara
Makker, Himender
Baldwin, David R
Stephens, Richard J
Parmar, Mahesh K
Spiro, Stephen G
Morris, Stephen
Janes, Sam M
author_facet Navani, Neal
Nankivell, Matthew
Lawrence, David R
Lock, Sara
Makker, Himender
Baldwin, David R
Stephens, Richard J
Parmar, Mahesh K
Spiro, Stephen G
Morris, Stephen
Janes, Sam M
author_sort Navani, Neal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is an important process that identifies treatment options and guides disease prognosis. We aimed to assess endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration as an initial investigation technique for patients with suspected lung cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients who had undergone a CT scan and had suspected stage I to IIIA lung cancer, from six UK centres and randomly assigned them to either endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or conventional diagnosis and staging (CDS), for further investigation and staging. If a target node could not be accessed by EBUS-TBNA, then endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was allowed as an alternative procedure. Randomisation was stratified according to the presence of mediastinal lymph nodes measuring 1 cm or more in the short axis and by recruiting centre. We used a telephone randomisation method with permuted blocks of four generated by a computer. Because of the nature of the intervention, masking of participants and consenting investigators was not possible. The primary endpoint was the time-to-treatment decision after completion of the diagnostic and staging investigations and analysis was by intention-to-diagnose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00652769. FINDINGS: Between June 10, 2008, and July 4, 2011, we randomly allocated 133 patients to treatment: 66 to EBUS-TBNA and 67 to CDS (one later withdrew consent). Two patients from the EBUS-TBNA group underwent EUS-FNA. The median time to treatment decision was shorter with EBUS-TBNA (14 days; 95% CI 14–15) than with CDS (29 days; 23–35) resulting in a hazard ratio of 1·98, (1·39–2·82, p<0·0001). One patient in each group had a pneumothorax from a CT-guided biopsy sample; the patient from the CDS group needed intercostal drainage and was admitted to hospital. INTERPRETATION: Transbronchial needle aspiration guided by endobronchial ultrasound should be considered as the initial investigation for patients with suspected lung cancer, because it reduces the time to treatment decision compared with conventional diagnosis and staging techniques. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4648022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46480222015-12-29 Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial Navani, Neal Nankivell, Matthew Lawrence, David R Lock, Sara Makker, Himender Baldwin, David R Stephens, Richard J Parmar, Mahesh K Spiro, Stephen G Morris, Stephen Janes, Sam M Lancet Respir Med Articles BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is an important process that identifies treatment options and guides disease prognosis. We aimed to assess endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration as an initial investigation technique for patients with suspected lung cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients who had undergone a CT scan and had suspected stage I to IIIA lung cancer, from six UK centres and randomly assigned them to either endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or conventional diagnosis and staging (CDS), for further investigation and staging. If a target node could not be accessed by EBUS-TBNA, then endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was allowed as an alternative procedure. Randomisation was stratified according to the presence of mediastinal lymph nodes measuring 1 cm or more in the short axis and by recruiting centre. We used a telephone randomisation method with permuted blocks of four generated by a computer. Because of the nature of the intervention, masking of participants and consenting investigators was not possible. The primary endpoint was the time-to-treatment decision after completion of the diagnostic and staging investigations and analysis was by intention-to-diagnose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00652769. FINDINGS: Between June 10, 2008, and July 4, 2011, we randomly allocated 133 patients to treatment: 66 to EBUS-TBNA and 67 to CDS (one later withdrew consent). Two patients from the EBUS-TBNA group underwent EUS-FNA. The median time to treatment decision was shorter with EBUS-TBNA (14 days; 95% CI 14–15) than with CDS (29 days; 23–35) resulting in a hazard ratio of 1·98, (1·39–2·82, p<0·0001). One patient in each group had a pneumothorax from a CT-guided biopsy sample; the patient from the CDS group needed intercostal drainage and was admitted to hospital. INTERPRETATION: Transbronchial needle aspiration guided by endobronchial ultrasound should be considered as the initial investigation for patients with suspected lung cancer, because it reduces the time to treatment decision compared with conventional diagnosis and staging techniques. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council. Elsevier 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4648022/ /pubmed/25660225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6 Text en © 2015 Navani et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Navani, Neal
Nankivell, Matthew
Lawrence, David R
Lock, Sara
Makker, Himender
Baldwin, David R
Stephens, Richard J
Parmar, Mahesh K
Spiro, Stephen G
Morris, Stephen
Janes, Sam M
Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title_full Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title_short Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
title_sort lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25660225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6
work_keys_str_mv AT navanineal lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nankivellmatthew lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawrencedavidr lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT locksara lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT makkerhimender lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT baldwindavidr lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stephensrichardj lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT parmarmaheshk lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT spirostepheng lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morrisstephen lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janessamm lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lungcancerdiagnosisandstagingwithendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationcomparedwithconventionalapproachesanopenlabelpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial