Cargando…
Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350 |
_version_ | 1782401195274403840 |
---|---|
author | Choo, Jocelyn M Leong, Lex EX Rogers, Geraint B |
author_facet | Choo, Jocelyn M Leong, Lex EX Rogers, Geraint B |
author_sort | Choo, Jocelyn M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, this is not feasible in many studies, particularly those involving sample collection in participants’ homes. We determined the extent to which a range of stabilisation and storage strategies maintained the composition of faecal microbial community structure relative to freezing to −80 °C. Refrigeration at 4 °C, storage at ambient temperature, and the use of several common preservative buffers (RNAlater, OMNIgene.GUT, Tris-EDTA) were assessed relative to freezing. Following 72 hours of storage, faecal microbial composition was assessed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Refrigeration was associated with no significant alteration in faecal microbiota diversity or composition. However, samples stored using other conditions showed substantial divergence compared to −80 °C control samples. Aside from refrigeration, the use of OMNIgene.GUT resulted in the least alteration, while the greatest change was seen in samples stored in Tris-EDTA buffer. The commercially available OMNIgene.GUT kit may provide an important alternative where refrigeration and cold chain transportation is not available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4648095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46480952015-11-23 Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles Choo, Jocelyn M Leong, Lex EX Rogers, Geraint B Sci Rep Article Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, this is not feasible in many studies, particularly those involving sample collection in participants’ homes. We determined the extent to which a range of stabilisation and storage strategies maintained the composition of faecal microbial community structure relative to freezing to −80 °C. Refrigeration at 4 °C, storage at ambient temperature, and the use of several common preservative buffers (RNAlater, OMNIgene.GUT, Tris-EDTA) were assessed relative to freezing. Following 72 hours of storage, faecal microbial composition was assessed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Refrigeration was associated with no significant alteration in faecal microbiota diversity or composition. However, samples stored using other conditions showed substantial divergence compared to −80 °C control samples. Aside from refrigeration, the use of OMNIgene.GUT resulted in the least alteration, while the greatest change was seen in samples stored in Tris-EDTA buffer. The commercially available OMNIgene.GUT kit may provide an important alternative where refrigeration and cold chain transportation is not available. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4648095/ /pubmed/26572876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Choo, Jocelyn M Leong, Lex EX Rogers, Geraint B Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title | Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title_full | Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title_fullStr | Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title_short | Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
title_sort | sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choojocelynm samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles AT leonglexex samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles AT rogersgeraintb samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles |