Cargando…

Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles

Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choo, Jocelyn M, Leong, Lex EX, Rogers, Geraint B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350
_version_ 1782401195274403840
author Choo, Jocelyn M
Leong, Lex EX
Rogers, Geraint B
author_facet Choo, Jocelyn M
Leong, Lex EX
Rogers, Geraint B
author_sort Choo, Jocelyn M
collection PubMed
description Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, this is not feasible in many studies, particularly those involving sample collection in participants’ homes. We determined the extent to which a range of stabilisation and storage strategies maintained the composition of faecal microbial community structure relative to freezing to −80 °C. Refrigeration at 4 °C, storage at ambient temperature, and the use of several common preservative buffers (RNAlater, OMNIgene.GUT, Tris-EDTA) were assessed relative to freezing. Following 72 hours of storage, faecal microbial composition was assessed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Refrigeration was associated with no significant alteration in faecal microbiota diversity or composition. However, samples stored using other conditions showed substantial divergence compared to −80 °C control samples. Aside from refrigeration, the use of OMNIgene.GUT resulted in the least alteration, while the greatest change was seen in samples stored in Tris-EDTA buffer. The commercially available OMNIgene.GUT kit may provide an important alternative where refrigeration and cold chain transportation is not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4648095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46480952015-11-23 Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles Choo, Jocelyn M Leong, Lex EX Rogers, Geraint B Sci Rep Article Sequencing-based studies of the human faecal microbiota are increasingly common. Appropriate storage of sample material is essential to avoid the introduction of post-collection bias in microbial community composition. Rapid freezing to −80 °C is commonly considered to be best-practice. However, this is not feasible in many studies, particularly those involving sample collection in participants’ homes. We determined the extent to which a range of stabilisation and storage strategies maintained the composition of faecal microbial community structure relative to freezing to −80 °C. Refrigeration at 4 °C, storage at ambient temperature, and the use of several common preservative buffers (RNAlater, OMNIgene.GUT, Tris-EDTA) were assessed relative to freezing. Following 72 hours of storage, faecal microbial composition was assessed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Refrigeration was associated with no significant alteration in faecal microbiota diversity or composition. However, samples stored using other conditions showed substantial divergence compared to −80 °C control samples. Aside from refrigeration, the use of OMNIgene.GUT resulted in the least alteration, while the greatest change was seen in samples stored in Tris-EDTA buffer. The commercially available OMNIgene.GUT kit may provide an important alternative where refrigeration and cold chain transportation is not available. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4648095/ /pubmed/26572876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Choo, Jocelyn M
Leong, Lex EX
Rogers, Geraint B
Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title_full Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title_fullStr Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title_full_unstemmed Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title_short Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
title_sort sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26572876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16350
work_keys_str_mv AT choojocelynm samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles
AT leonglexex samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles
AT rogersgeraintb samplestorageconditionssignificantlyinfluencefaecalmicrobiomeprofiles