Cargando…
Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study
Peer review is the "gold standard" for evaluating journal and conference papers, research proposals, on-going projects and university departments. However, it is widely believed that current systems are expensive, conservative and prone to various forms of bias. One form of bias identified...
Autores principales: | Walker, Richard, Barros, Beatriz, Conejo, Ricardo, Neumann, Konrad, Telefont, Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594326 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6012.2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
por: Helmer, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Attribution bias and social anxiety in schizophrenia
por: Achim, Amelie M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The role of author identities in peer review
por: Shah, Nihar B.
Publicado: (2023) -
Working toward reducing bias in peer review
por: Rye, Kerry-Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Working toward reducing bias in peer review
por: Rye, Kerry-Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2021)