Cargando…

Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases

Current data on the concordance of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutation status or PTEN expression status between primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine concordance and discordance of the status of these four biom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Chen, Wu, Xin-Yin, Yang, Zu-Yao, Threapleton, Diane Erin, Yuan, Jin-Qiu, Yu, Yuan-Yuan, Tang, Jin-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25639985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08065
_version_ 1782401232946593792
author Mao, Chen
Wu, Xin-Yin
Yang, Zu-Yao
Threapleton, Diane Erin
Yuan, Jin-Qiu
Yu, Yuan-Yuan
Tang, Jin-Ling
author_facet Mao, Chen
Wu, Xin-Yin
Yang, Zu-Yao
Threapleton, Diane Erin
Yuan, Jin-Qiu
Yu, Yuan-Yuan
Tang, Jin-Ling
author_sort Mao, Chen
collection PubMed
description Current data on the concordance of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutation status or PTEN expression status between primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine concordance and discordance of the status of these four biomarkers between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC patients. The biomarker status in primary tumors was used as the reference standard. Concordance data for KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN were provided by 43, 16, 9 and 7 studies, respectively. The pooled concordance rate was 92.0% (95% CI: 89.7%–93.9%) for KRAS, 96.8% (95% CI: 94.8%–98.0%) for BRAF, 93.9% (95% CI: 89.7%–96.5%) for PIK3CA and 71.7% (95% CI: 57.6%–82.5%) for PTEN. The pooled false positive and false negative rates for KRAS were 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%–12.4%) and 11.3% (95% CI: 8.0%–15.8%), respectively. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations are highly concordant between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC, but PTEN loss is not. Nine percent of patients with wild-type KRAS in primary tumors who received anti-EGFR treatment had mutant KRAS in metastases, while 11.3% patients with mutant KRAS primary tumors had wild-type KRAS in the metastases. These 11.3% patients currently do not receive potentially beneficial anti-EGFR treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4648436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46484362015-11-23 Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases Mao, Chen Wu, Xin-Yin Yang, Zu-Yao Threapleton, Diane Erin Yuan, Jin-Qiu Yu, Yuan-Yuan Tang, Jin-Ling Sci Rep Article Current data on the concordance of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutation status or PTEN expression status between primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine concordance and discordance of the status of these four biomarkers between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC patients. The biomarker status in primary tumors was used as the reference standard. Concordance data for KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN were provided by 43, 16, 9 and 7 studies, respectively. The pooled concordance rate was 92.0% (95% CI: 89.7%–93.9%) for KRAS, 96.8% (95% CI: 94.8%–98.0%) for BRAF, 93.9% (95% CI: 89.7%–96.5%) for PIK3CA and 71.7% (95% CI: 57.6%–82.5%) for PTEN. The pooled false positive and false negative rates for KRAS were 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%–12.4%) and 11.3% (95% CI: 8.0%–15.8%), respectively. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations are highly concordant between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC, but PTEN loss is not. Nine percent of patients with wild-type KRAS in primary tumors who received anti-EGFR treatment had mutant KRAS in metastases, while 11.3% patients with mutant KRAS primary tumors had wild-type KRAS in the metastases. These 11.3% patients currently do not receive potentially beneficial anti-EGFR treatment. Nature Publishing Group 2015-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4648436/ /pubmed/25639985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08065 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Mao, Chen
Wu, Xin-Yin
Yang, Zu-Yao
Threapleton, Diane Erin
Yuan, Jin-Qiu
Yu, Yuan-Yuan
Tang, Jin-Ling
Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title_full Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title_fullStr Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title_full_unstemmed Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title_short Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
title_sort concordant analysis of kras, braf, pik3ca mutations, and pten expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25639985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08065
work_keys_str_mv AT maochen concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT wuxinyin concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT yangzuyao concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT threapletondianeerin concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT yuanjinqiu concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT yuyuanyuan concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases
AT tangjinling concordantanalysisofkrasbrafpik3camutationsandptenexpressionbetweenprimarycolorectalcancerandmatchedmetastases