Cargando…

Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects

To compare subjective refraction under binocular and monocular conditions, and to investigate the clinical factors affecting the difference in spherical refraction between the two conditions. We examined thirty eyes of 30 healthy subjects. Binocular and monocular refraction without cycloplegia was m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobashi, Hidenaga, Kamiya, Kazutaka, Handa, Tomoya, Ando, Wakako, Kawamorita, Takushi, Igarashi, Akihito, Shimizu, Kimiya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12606
_version_ 1782401243090518016
author Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Handa, Tomoya
Ando, Wakako
Kawamorita, Takushi
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
author_facet Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Handa, Tomoya
Ando, Wakako
Kawamorita, Takushi
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
author_sort Kobashi, Hidenaga
collection PubMed
description To compare subjective refraction under binocular and monocular conditions, and to investigate the clinical factors affecting the difference in spherical refraction between the two conditions. We examined thirty eyes of 30 healthy subjects. Binocular and monocular refraction without cycloplegia was measured through circular polarizing lenses in both eyes, using the Landolt-C chart of the 3D visual function trainer-ORTe. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to assess the relations among several pairs of variables and the difference in spherical refraction in binocular and monocular conditions. Subjective spherical refraction in the monocular condition was significantly more myopic than that in the binocular condition (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were seen in subjective cylindrical refraction (p = 0.99). The explanatory variable relevant to the difference in spherical refraction between binocular and monocular conditions was the binocular spherical refraction (p = 0.032, partial regression coefficient B = 0.029) (adjusted R(2) = 0.230). No significant correlation was seen with other clinical factors. Subjective spherical refraction in the monocular condition was significantly more myopic than that in the binocular condition. Eyes with higher degrees of myopia are more predisposed to show the large difference in spherical refraction between these two conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4648493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46484932015-11-23 Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects Kobashi, Hidenaga Kamiya, Kazutaka Handa, Tomoya Ando, Wakako Kawamorita, Takushi Igarashi, Akihito Shimizu, Kimiya Sci Rep Article To compare subjective refraction under binocular and monocular conditions, and to investigate the clinical factors affecting the difference in spherical refraction between the two conditions. We examined thirty eyes of 30 healthy subjects. Binocular and monocular refraction without cycloplegia was measured through circular polarizing lenses in both eyes, using the Landolt-C chart of the 3D visual function trainer-ORTe. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to assess the relations among several pairs of variables and the difference in spherical refraction in binocular and monocular conditions. Subjective spherical refraction in the monocular condition was significantly more myopic than that in the binocular condition (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were seen in subjective cylindrical refraction (p = 0.99). The explanatory variable relevant to the difference in spherical refraction between binocular and monocular conditions was the binocular spherical refraction (p = 0.032, partial regression coefficient B = 0.029) (adjusted R(2) = 0.230). No significant correlation was seen with other clinical factors. Subjective spherical refraction in the monocular condition was significantly more myopic than that in the binocular condition. Eyes with higher degrees of myopia are more predisposed to show the large difference in spherical refraction between these two conditions. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4648493/ /pubmed/26218972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12606 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Handa, Tomoya
Ando, Wakako
Kawamorita, Takushi
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title_full Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title_fullStr Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title_short Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects
title_sort comparison of subjective refraction under binocular and monocular conditions in myopic subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12606
work_keys_str_mv AT kobashihidenaga comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT kamiyakazutaka comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT handatomoya comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT andowakako comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT kawamoritatakushi comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT igarashiakihito comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects
AT shimizukimiya comparisonofsubjectiverefractionunderbinocularandmonocularconditionsinmyopicsubjects