Cargando…
Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0 |
_version_ | 1782401280205914112 |
---|---|
author | Kon, Elizaveta Filardo, Giuseppe Perdisa, Francesco Venieri, Giulia Marcacci, Maurilio |
author_facet | Kon, Elizaveta Filardo, Giuseppe Perdisa, Francesco Venieri, Giulia Marcacci, Maurilio |
author_sort | Kon, Elizaveta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi-layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three-layered collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid-term follow-up. The second is a PLGA-calcium-sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short-term outcomes of limited case-series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite-based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in-depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high-level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4648845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46488452015-11-25 Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration Kon, Elizaveta Filardo, Giuseppe Perdisa, Francesco Venieri, Giulia Marcacci, Maurilio J Exp Orthop Review Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi-layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three-layered collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid-term follow-up. The second is a PLGA-calcium-sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short-term outcomes of limited case-series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite-based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in-depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high-level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4648845/ /pubmed/26914755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0 Text en © Kon et al.; licensee Springer 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kon, Elizaveta Filardo, Giuseppe Perdisa, Francesco Venieri, Giulia Marcacci, Maurilio Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title | Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title_full | Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title_fullStr | Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title_short | Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
title_sort | clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konelizaveta clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration AT filardogiuseppe clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration AT perdisafrancesco clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration AT venierigiulia clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration AT marcaccimaurilio clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration |