Cargando…

Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration

Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kon, Elizaveta, Filardo, Giuseppe, Perdisa, Francesco, Venieri, Giulia, Marcacci, Maurilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0
_version_ 1782401280205914112
author Kon, Elizaveta
Filardo, Giuseppe
Perdisa, Francesco
Venieri, Giulia
Marcacci, Maurilio
author_facet Kon, Elizaveta
Filardo, Giuseppe
Perdisa, Francesco
Venieri, Giulia
Marcacci, Maurilio
author_sort Kon, Elizaveta
collection PubMed
description Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi-layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three-layered collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid-term follow-up. The second is a PLGA-calcium-sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short-term outcomes of limited case-series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite-based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in-depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high-level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4648845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46488452015-11-25 Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration Kon, Elizaveta Filardo, Giuseppe Perdisa, Francesco Venieri, Giulia Marcacci, Maurilio J Exp Orthop Review Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell-free scaffolds, which provide a three-dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi-layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three-layered collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid-term follow-up. The second is a PLGA-calcium-sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short-term outcomes of limited case-series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite-based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in-depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high-level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4648845/ /pubmed/26914755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0 Text en © Kon et al.; licensee Springer 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Kon, Elizaveta
Filardo, Giuseppe
Perdisa, Francesco
Venieri, Giulia
Marcacci, Maurilio
Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_full Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_fullStr Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_short Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_sort clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0
work_keys_str_mv AT konelizaveta clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT filardogiuseppe clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT perdisafrancesco clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT venierigiulia clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT marcaccimaurilio clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration