Cargando…

A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)

BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaneet Kumar, J., Dudhamal, Tukaram S., Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Mahanta, Vyasadev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664236
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743
_version_ 1782401385634988032
author Vaneet Kumar, J.
Dudhamal, Tukaram S.
Gupta, Sanjay Kumar
Mahanta, Vyasadev
author_facet Vaneet Kumar, J.
Dudhamal, Tukaram S.
Gupta, Sanjay Kumar
Mahanta, Vyasadev
author_sort Vaneet Kumar, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term relief in pain or surgical intervention with side-effect. There is need to find out quick relief from pain in today's era as it affects physical as well as mental and social life of patients. In Ayurveda, various modalities are given but Agnikarma and Siravedha are supposed to give instant relief from pain. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of Agnikarma and Siravedha in the management of Griidhrasi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It's an open randomized parallel group trial. A total of 30 patients, divided randomly in two groups, were treated by Agnikarma in 19 patients and Siravedha in 11 patients. Agnikarama was done at lumbosacral spine and Achilles tendon region by Panchadhatu Shalaka. Siravedha was done from four Angulas below Janu Sandhi (Knee joint). Placebo starch capsules were given to all patients. Paired t-test applied for efficacy within the group and Chi-square test to compare the efficacy of two groups. RESULTS: Individually both groups had given relief in cardinal symptoms of Gridhrasi. 68.42% patients showed marked improvement and 21.05% had complete relief after Agnikarma. In Siravedha, 72.73% patients had moderate improvement whereas 27.27% patient had marked improvement. CONCLUSION: Agnikarma gives better effect than Siravedha in management of Gridhrasi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4649569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46495692015-12-10 A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) Vaneet Kumar, J. Dudhamal, Tukaram S. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mahanta, Vyasadev Ayu Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term relief in pain or surgical intervention with side-effect. There is need to find out quick relief from pain in today's era as it affects physical as well as mental and social life of patients. In Ayurveda, various modalities are given but Agnikarma and Siravedha are supposed to give instant relief from pain. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of Agnikarma and Siravedha in the management of Griidhrasi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It's an open randomized parallel group trial. A total of 30 patients, divided randomly in two groups, were treated by Agnikarma in 19 patients and Siravedha in 11 patients. Agnikarama was done at lumbosacral spine and Achilles tendon region by Panchadhatu Shalaka. Siravedha was done from four Angulas below Janu Sandhi (Knee joint). Placebo starch capsules were given to all patients. Paired t-test applied for efficacy within the group and Chi-square test to compare the efficacy of two groups. RESULTS: Individually both groups had given relief in cardinal symptoms of Gridhrasi. 68.42% patients showed marked improvement and 21.05% had complete relief after Agnikarma. In Siravedha, 72.73% patients had moderate improvement whereas 27.27% patient had marked improvement. CONCLUSION: Agnikarma gives better effect than Siravedha in management of Gridhrasi. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4649569/ /pubmed/26664236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743 Text en Copyright: © AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Vaneet Kumar, J.
Dudhamal, Tukaram S.
Gupta, Sanjay Kumar
Mahanta, Vyasadev
A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title_full A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title_fullStr A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title_full_unstemmed A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title_short A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
title_sort comparative clinical study of siravedha and agnikarma in management of gridhrasi (sciatica)
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664236
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743
work_keys_str_mv AT vaneetkumarj acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT dudhamaltukarams acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT guptasanjaykumar acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT mahantavyasadev acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT vaneetkumarj comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT dudhamaltukarams comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT guptasanjaykumar comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica
AT mahantavyasadev comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica