Cargando…
A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica)
BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743 |
_version_ | 1782401385634988032 |
---|---|
author | Vaneet Kumar, J. Dudhamal, Tukaram S. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mahanta, Vyasadev |
author_facet | Vaneet Kumar, J. Dudhamal, Tukaram S. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mahanta, Vyasadev |
author_sort | Vaneet Kumar, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term relief in pain or surgical intervention with side-effect. There is need to find out quick relief from pain in today's era as it affects physical as well as mental and social life of patients. In Ayurveda, various modalities are given but Agnikarma and Siravedha are supposed to give instant relief from pain. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of Agnikarma and Siravedha in the management of Griidhrasi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It's an open randomized parallel group trial. A total of 30 patients, divided randomly in two groups, were treated by Agnikarma in 19 patients and Siravedha in 11 patients. Agnikarama was done at lumbosacral spine and Achilles tendon region by Panchadhatu Shalaka. Siravedha was done from four Angulas below Janu Sandhi (Knee joint). Placebo starch capsules were given to all patients. Paired t-test applied for efficacy within the group and Chi-square test to compare the efficacy of two groups. RESULTS: Individually both groups had given relief in cardinal symptoms of Gridhrasi. 68.42% patients showed marked improvement and 21.05% had complete relief after Agnikarma. In Siravedha, 72.73% patients had moderate improvement whereas 27.27% patient had marked improvement. CONCLUSION: Agnikarma gives better effect than Siravedha in management of Gridhrasi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4649569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46495692015-12-10 A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) Vaneet Kumar, J. Dudhamal, Tukaram S. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mahanta, Vyasadev Ayu Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Lifetime incidence of low back pain is 50-70% and incidence of clinically significant sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse occurs in 4-6% of the population. Low back pain and sciatica is major cause of morbidity throughout the world. There is only conservative treatment giving short-term relief in pain or surgical intervention with side-effect. There is need to find out quick relief from pain in today's era as it affects physical as well as mental and social life of patients. In Ayurveda, various modalities are given but Agnikarma and Siravedha are supposed to give instant relief from pain. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of Agnikarma and Siravedha in the management of Griidhrasi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It's an open randomized parallel group trial. A total of 30 patients, divided randomly in two groups, were treated by Agnikarma in 19 patients and Siravedha in 11 patients. Agnikarama was done at lumbosacral spine and Achilles tendon region by Panchadhatu Shalaka. Siravedha was done from four Angulas below Janu Sandhi (Knee joint). Placebo starch capsules were given to all patients. Paired t-test applied for efficacy within the group and Chi-square test to compare the efficacy of two groups. RESULTS: Individually both groups had given relief in cardinal symptoms of Gridhrasi. 68.42% patients showed marked improvement and 21.05% had complete relief after Agnikarma. In Siravedha, 72.73% patients had moderate improvement whereas 27.27% patient had marked improvement. CONCLUSION: Agnikarma gives better effect than Siravedha in management of Gridhrasi. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4649569/ /pubmed/26664236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743 Text en Copyright: © AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Vaneet Kumar, J. Dudhamal, Tukaram S. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mahanta, Vyasadev A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title | A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title_full | A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title_fullStr | A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title_short | A comparative clinical study of Siravedha and Agnikarma in management of Gridhrasi (sciatica) |
title_sort | comparative clinical study of siravedha and agnikarma in management of gridhrasi (sciatica) |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.153743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaneetkumarj acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT dudhamaltukarams acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT guptasanjaykumar acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT mahantavyasadev acomparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT vaneetkumarj comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT dudhamaltukarams comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT guptasanjaykumar comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica AT mahantavyasadev comparativeclinicalstudyofsiravedhaandagnikarmainmanagementofgridhrasisciatica |