Cargando…

The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System

Introduction: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance and usability of the FreeStyle(®) Libre™ Flash glucose monitoring system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) for interstitial glucose results compared with capillary blood glucose results. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Timothy, Bode, Bruce W., Christiansen, Mark P., Klaff, Leslie J., Alva, Shridhara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2014.0378
_version_ 1782401404596387840
author Bailey, Timothy
Bode, Bruce W.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Alva, Shridhara
author_facet Bailey, Timothy
Bode, Bruce W.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Alva, Shridhara
author_sort Bailey, Timothy
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance and usability of the FreeStyle(®) Libre™ Flash glucose monitoring system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) for interstitial glucose results compared with capillary blood glucose results. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two study participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled by four U.S. clinical sites. A sensor was inserted on the back of each upper arm for up to 14 days. Three factory-only calibrated sensor lots were used in the study. Sensor glucose measurements were compared with capillary blood glucose (BG) results (approximately eight per day) obtained using the BG meter built into the reader (BG reference) and with the YSI analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, OH) reference tests at three clinic visits (32 samples per visit). Sensor readings were masked to the participants. Results: The accuracy of the results was demonstrated against capillary BG reference values, with 86.7% of sensor results within Consensus Error Grid Zone A. The percentage of readings within Consensus Error Grid Zone A on Days 2, 7, and 14 was 88.4%, 89.2%, and 85.2%, respectively. The overall mean absolute relative difference was 11.4%. The mean lag time between sensor and YSI reference values was 4.5±4.8 min. Sensor accuracy was not affected by factors such as body mass index, age, type of diabetes, clinical site, insulin administration, or hemoglobin A1c. Conclusions: Interstitial glucose measurements with the FreeStyle Libre system were found to be accurate compared with capillary BG reference values, with accuracy remaining stable over 14 days of wear and unaffected by patient characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4649725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46497252015-12-02 The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System Bailey, Timothy Bode, Bruce W. Christiansen, Mark P. Klaff, Leslie J. Alva, Shridhara Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Introduction: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance and usability of the FreeStyle(®) Libre™ Flash glucose monitoring system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) for interstitial glucose results compared with capillary blood glucose results. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two study participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled by four U.S. clinical sites. A sensor was inserted on the back of each upper arm for up to 14 days. Three factory-only calibrated sensor lots were used in the study. Sensor glucose measurements were compared with capillary blood glucose (BG) results (approximately eight per day) obtained using the BG meter built into the reader (BG reference) and with the YSI analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, OH) reference tests at three clinic visits (32 samples per visit). Sensor readings were masked to the participants. Results: The accuracy of the results was demonstrated against capillary BG reference values, with 86.7% of sensor results within Consensus Error Grid Zone A. The percentage of readings within Consensus Error Grid Zone A on Days 2, 7, and 14 was 88.4%, 89.2%, and 85.2%, respectively. The overall mean absolute relative difference was 11.4%. The mean lag time between sensor and YSI reference values was 4.5±4.8 min. Sensor accuracy was not affected by factors such as body mass index, age, type of diabetes, clinical site, insulin administration, or hemoglobin A1c. Conclusions: Interstitial glucose measurements with the FreeStyle Libre system were found to be accurate compared with capillary BG reference values, with accuracy remaining stable over 14 days of wear and unaffected by patient characteristics. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4649725/ /pubmed/26171659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2014.0378 Text en © The Author(s) 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bailey, Timothy
Bode, Bruce W.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Alva, Shridhara
The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title_full The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title_fullStr The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title_full_unstemmed The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title_short The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
title_sort performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2014.0378
work_keys_str_mv AT baileytimothy theperformanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT bodebrucew theperformanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT christiansenmarkp theperformanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT klafflesliej theperformanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT alvashridhara theperformanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT baileytimothy performanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT bodebrucew performanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT christiansenmarkp performanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT klafflesliej performanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT alvashridhara performanceandusabilityofafactorycalibratedflashglucosemonitoringsystem