Cargando…
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial registries can improve the validity of trial results by facilitating comparisons between prospectively planned and reported outcomes. Previous reports on the frequency of planned and reported outcome inconsistencies have reported widely discrepant results. It is unknown wh...
Autores principales: | Jones, Christopher W., Keil, Lukas G., Holland, Wesley C., Caughey, Melissa C., Platts-Mills, Timothy F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: cross-sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)