Cargando…
Do alternative methods for analysing count data produce similar estimates? Implications for meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Many randomised trials have count outcomes, such as the number of falls or the number of asthma exacerbations. These outcomes have been treated as counts, continuous outcomes or dichotomised and analysed using a variety of analytical methods. This study examines whether different methods...
Autores principales: | Herbison, Peter, Robertson, M. Clare, McKenzie, Joanne E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0144-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impact of analysing continuous outcomes using final values, change scores and analysis of covariance on the performance of meta‐analytic methods: a simulation study
por: McKenzie, Joanne E., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Estimation in meta-analyses of response ratios
por: Bakbergenuly, Ilyas, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol
por: Kanukula, Raju, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An alternative method to analyse the biomarker‐strategy design
por: Kunz, Cornelia Ursula, et al.
Publicado: (2018)