Cargando…

A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: This study compared VMAT and IMRT plans for intact breast radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer and evaluated the irradiated dose of planning target volume and OARs, especially focusing on heart and coronary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with left sided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Hongfu, He, Mingyuan, Cheng, Guanghui, Han, Dongmei, Wu, Ning, Shi, Dan, Zhao, Zhipeng, Jin, Jianxue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0531-4
_version_ 1782401475299770368
author Zhao, Hongfu
He, Mingyuan
Cheng, Guanghui
Han, Dongmei
Wu, Ning
Shi, Dan
Zhao, Zhipeng
Jin, Jianxue
author_facet Zhao, Hongfu
He, Mingyuan
Cheng, Guanghui
Han, Dongmei
Wu, Ning
Shi, Dan
Zhao, Zhipeng
Jin, Jianxue
author_sort Zhao, Hongfu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: This study compared VMAT and IMRT plans for intact breast radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer and evaluated the irradiated dose of planning target volume and OARs, especially focusing on heart and coronary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with left sided breast cancer whose breast was relatively smaller (the mean volumes is 296 cc) treated with breast-conserving surgery were prescribed radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions using two or four-field step and shoot IMRT (2 or 4-F IMRT), and one or two-arc VMAT (1 or 2-arc VMAT). The 10 Gy electron boost to the tumor bed after delivery of 50 Gy was not included in the analysis. Multiple planning parameters for the PTV and the PRV-OARs were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment plans generated using VMAT had better PTV homogeneity than the IMRT plans. For the PRV-OARs, the 1-arc VMAT had significantly higher D(mean) and V5 for left lung and heart, and showed worse D(mean) for liver, esophagus, spinal cord, contralateral lung and breast. In contrast, the 2-arc VMAT and the 2-F or 4-F IMRT plans showed better results for the PRV-OARs than the 1-arc VMAT. However, for the heart and coronary artery, the 1-arc VMAT showed better V20 and V40 compared with the other plans. Moreover, the 2 F-IMRT had specially advantage on V5 and V20 for heart and V5 for coronary arteries, the 2-F IMRT also showed a greater MU and treatment times. Using the table of quality score to evaluate the plans, we found that 2-F IMRT had the highest scores of 13, followed by the 2-arc VMAT plan (10 points) and 1-arc VMAT plan (8 points), and finally the 4-F IMRT plan (6 points). Moreover, when a dose comparison for heart minus coronary artery was calculated, the V20 and V40 for the rest of heart in all plans were very small and closed, indicating the dose to the coronary artery contributed dramatically to the high dose volumes for the entire heart. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other plans, the 2-F IMRT plan with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time is an appropriate technique for left sided breast cancer, which achieved good PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk besides for the heart and coronary artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4650319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46503192015-11-19 A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT Zhao, Hongfu He, Mingyuan Cheng, Guanghui Han, Dongmei Wu, Ning Shi, Dan Zhao, Zhipeng Jin, Jianxue Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: This study compared VMAT and IMRT plans for intact breast radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer and evaluated the irradiated dose of planning target volume and OARs, especially focusing on heart and coronary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with left sided breast cancer whose breast was relatively smaller (the mean volumes is 296 cc) treated with breast-conserving surgery were prescribed radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions using two or four-field step and shoot IMRT (2 or 4-F IMRT), and one or two-arc VMAT (1 or 2-arc VMAT). The 10 Gy electron boost to the tumor bed after delivery of 50 Gy was not included in the analysis. Multiple planning parameters for the PTV and the PRV-OARs were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment plans generated using VMAT had better PTV homogeneity than the IMRT plans. For the PRV-OARs, the 1-arc VMAT had significantly higher D(mean) and V5 for left lung and heart, and showed worse D(mean) for liver, esophagus, spinal cord, contralateral lung and breast. In contrast, the 2-arc VMAT and the 2-F or 4-F IMRT plans showed better results for the PRV-OARs than the 1-arc VMAT. However, for the heart and coronary artery, the 1-arc VMAT showed better V20 and V40 compared with the other plans. Moreover, the 2 F-IMRT had specially advantage on V5 and V20 for heart and V5 for coronary arteries, the 2-F IMRT also showed a greater MU and treatment times. Using the table of quality score to evaluate the plans, we found that 2-F IMRT had the highest scores of 13, followed by the 2-arc VMAT plan (10 points) and 1-arc VMAT plan (8 points), and finally the 4-F IMRT plan (6 points). Moreover, when a dose comparison for heart minus coronary artery was calculated, the V20 and V40 for the rest of heart in all plans were very small and closed, indicating the dose to the coronary artery contributed dramatically to the high dose volumes for the entire heart. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other plans, the 2-F IMRT plan with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time is an appropriate technique for left sided breast cancer, which achieved good PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk besides for the heart and coronary artery. BioMed Central 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4650319/ /pubmed/26577189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0531-4 Text en © Zhao et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Hongfu
He, Mingyuan
Cheng, Guanghui
Han, Dongmei
Wu, Ning
Shi, Dan
Zhao, Zhipeng
Jin, Jianxue
A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title_full A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title_fullStr A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title_full_unstemmed A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title_short A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT
title_sort comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with vmat and imrt
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0531-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaohongfu acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT hemingyuan acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT chengguanghui acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT handongmei acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT wuning acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT shidan acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT zhaozhipeng acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT jinjianxue acomparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT zhaohongfu comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT hemingyuan comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT chengguanghui comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT handongmei comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT wuning comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT shidan comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT zhaozhipeng comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt
AT jinjianxue comparativedosimetricstudyofleftsidedbreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgerytreatedwithvmatandimrt