Cargando…

Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment for men with prostate cancer and positive pelvic nodes, N+, is an area of active controversy. We report our 5-years outcomes in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (T1-T4N0-N1M0) treated with definitive radiotherapy encompassing the prostate and pelvi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lilleby, Wolfgang, Narrang, Amol, Tafjord, Gunnar, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Russnes, Kjell Magne, Stensvold, Andreas, Hole, Knut Håkon, Tran, Phuoc, Eilertsen, Karsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0540-3
_version_ 1782401504537214976
author Lilleby, Wolfgang
Narrang, Amol
Tafjord, Gunnar
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Russnes, Kjell Magne
Stensvold, Andreas
Hole, Knut Håkon
Tran, Phuoc
Eilertsen, Karsten
author_facet Lilleby, Wolfgang
Narrang, Amol
Tafjord, Gunnar
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Russnes, Kjell Magne
Stensvold, Andreas
Hole, Knut Håkon
Tran, Phuoc
Eilertsen, Karsten
author_sort Lilleby, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment for men with prostate cancer and positive pelvic nodes, N+, is an area of active controversy. We report our 5-years outcomes in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (T1-T4N0-N1M0) treated with definitive radiotherapy encompassing the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 138 consecutive eligible men all living patients have been followed up to almost 5 years. Survival endpoints for 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazards models were constructed for all survival endpoints. The RTOG morbidity grading system for physician rated toxicity was applied. RESULTS: Patients with locally advanced T3-T4 tumors (35 %) and N1 (51 %) have favorable outcome when long-term ADT is combined with definitive radiotherapy encompassing pelvic lymph nodes. The 5-year BFFS, RFS, PCSS and OS were 71.4, 76.2, 94.5 and 89.0 %, respectively. High Gleason sum (9–10) had a strong independent prognostic impact on BFFS, RFS and OS (p = 0.001, <0.001, and 0.005 respectively). The duration of ADT (= > 28 months) showed a significant independent association with improved PCSS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.001). Lymph node involvement was not associated with survival endpoints in the multivariate analysis. The radiotherapy induced toxicity seen in our study population was moderate with rare Grade 3 GI side effects and up to 11 % for Grade 3 GU consisting mainly of urgency and frequency. CONCLUSION: Pelvic IMRT in combination with long-term ADT can achieve long-lasting disease control in men with N+ disease and unfavorable prognostic factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0540-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4650510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46505102015-11-19 Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy Lilleby, Wolfgang Narrang, Amol Tafjord, Gunnar Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Russnes, Kjell Magne Stensvold, Andreas Hole, Knut Håkon Tran, Phuoc Eilertsen, Karsten Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment for men with prostate cancer and positive pelvic nodes, N+, is an area of active controversy. We report our 5-years outcomes in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (T1-T4N0-N1M0) treated with definitive radiotherapy encompassing the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 138 consecutive eligible men all living patients have been followed up to almost 5 years. Survival endpoints for 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazards models were constructed for all survival endpoints. The RTOG morbidity grading system for physician rated toxicity was applied. RESULTS: Patients with locally advanced T3-T4 tumors (35 %) and N1 (51 %) have favorable outcome when long-term ADT is combined with definitive radiotherapy encompassing pelvic lymph nodes. The 5-year BFFS, RFS, PCSS and OS were 71.4, 76.2, 94.5 and 89.0 %, respectively. High Gleason sum (9–10) had a strong independent prognostic impact on BFFS, RFS and OS (p = 0.001, <0.001, and 0.005 respectively). The duration of ADT (= > 28 months) showed a significant independent association with improved PCSS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.001). Lymph node involvement was not associated with survival endpoints in the multivariate analysis. The radiotherapy induced toxicity seen in our study population was moderate with rare Grade 3 GI side effects and up to 11 % for Grade 3 GU consisting mainly of urgency and frequency. CONCLUSION: Pelvic IMRT in combination with long-term ADT can achieve long-lasting disease control in men with N+ disease and unfavorable prognostic factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0540-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4650510/ /pubmed/26577452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0540-3 Text en © Lilleby et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lilleby, Wolfgang
Narrang, Amol
Tafjord, Gunnar
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Russnes, Kjell Magne
Stensvold, Andreas
Hole, Knut Håkon
Tran, Phuoc
Eilertsen, Karsten
Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title_full Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title_fullStr Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title_short Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy
title_sort favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic imrt and androgen deprivation therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0540-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lillebywolfgang favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT narrangamol favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT tafjordgunnar favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT vlatkovicljiljana favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT russneskjellmagne favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT stensvoldandreas favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT holeknuthakon favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT tranphuoc favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT eilertsenkarsten favorableoutcomesinlocallyadvancedandnodepositiveprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithcombinedpelvicimrtandandrogendeprivationtherapy