Cargando…

Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging. It is unclear whether galactomannan (GM) results from bronchial wash (BW) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples differ in a clinically meaningful way. RESULTS: Ninety-six paired (BAL and BW) samples from 85 patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taremi, Mahnaz, Kleinberg, Michael E., Wang, Elizabeth W., Gilliam, Bruce L., Ryscavage, Patrick A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0111-3
_version_ 1782401569784856576
author Taremi, Mahnaz
Kleinberg, Michael E.
Wang, Elizabeth W.
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Ryscavage, Patrick A.
author_facet Taremi, Mahnaz
Kleinberg, Michael E.
Wang, Elizabeth W.
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Ryscavage, Patrick A.
author_sort Taremi, Mahnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging. It is unclear whether galactomannan (GM) results from bronchial wash (BW) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples differ in a clinically meaningful way. RESULTS: Ninety-six paired (BAL and BW) samples from 85 patients were included. The average age was 53 years, 61 % of the patients were male, and 74.1 % had an underlying diagnosis of AML/MDS (ALL 7.1 %, other hematologic malignancy 18.8 %). 57 (67.1 %) patients were neutropenic, and 56 (65.9 %) patients were receiving mold-active drugs at least 48 h prior to bronchoscopy. The overall agreement between GM detection from BW and BAL was 63.5 % (K = 0.152; 95 % CI 0.008–0.311) and 73 % (K = 0.149; 95 % CI 0.048–0.348) at cut off ≥0.5 and ≥1.0, respectively. Among 43 positive samples, using a GM cut-off of 0.5, 39 (90.5 %) were positive in BW samples whereas 12 (29.3 %) were positive in BAL samples. The median level of GM in BW (0.28) samples was significantly higher than in BAL (0.20) samples among 53 samples with negative results (P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median GM values between the BW and BAL samples with positive results (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in GM detection between samples with positive and negative results with regard to antifungal, beta lactam antibacterial treatment or neutropenia (60.5 vs 56.6 %; 53.9 vs 46 %; 65.1 vs 54.7 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study examining two collection techniques suggests that BW may have higher diagnostic yield compared to bronchoalveolar lavage for GM detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4650847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46508472015-11-19 Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies Taremi, Mahnaz Kleinberg, Michael E. Wang, Elizabeth W. Gilliam, Bruce L. Ryscavage, Patrick A. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Short Report BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging. It is unclear whether galactomannan (GM) results from bronchial wash (BW) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples differ in a clinically meaningful way. RESULTS: Ninety-six paired (BAL and BW) samples from 85 patients were included. The average age was 53 years, 61 % of the patients were male, and 74.1 % had an underlying diagnosis of AML/MDS (ALL 7.1 %, other hematologic malignancy 18.8 %). 57 (67.1 %) patients were neutropenic, and 56 (65.9 %) patients were receiving mold-active drugs at least 48 h prior to bronchoscopy. The overall agreement between GM detection from BW and BAL was 63.5 % (K = 0.152; 95 % CI 0.008–0.311) and 73 % (K = 0.149; 95 % CI 0.048–0.348) at cut off ≥0.5 and ≥1.0, respectively. Among 43 positive samples, using a GM cut-off of 0.5, 39 (90.5 %) were positive in BW samples whereas 12 (29.3 %) were positive in BAL samples. The median level of GM in BW (0.28) samples was significantly higher than in BAL (0.20) samples among 53 samples with negative results (P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median GM values between the BW and BAL samples with positive results (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in GM detection between samples with positive and negative results with regard to antifungal, beta lactam antibacterial treatment or neutropenia (60.5 vs 56.6 %; 53.9 vs 46 %; 65.1 vs 54.7 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study examining two collection techniques suggests that BW may have higher diagnostic yield compared to bronchoalveolar lavage for GM detection. BioMed Central 2015-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4650847/ /pubmed/26576545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0111-3 Text en © Taremi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Taremi, Mahnaz
Kleinberg, Michael E.
Wang, Elizabeth W.
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Ryscavage, Patrick A.
Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title_full Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title_fullStr Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title_short Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
title_sort galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0111-3
work_keys_str_mv AT taremimahnaz galactomannanantigendetectionusingbronchialwashandbronchoalveolarlavageinpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT kleinbergmichaele galactomannanantigendetectionusingbronchialwashandbronchoalveolarlavageinpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT wangelizabethw galactomannanantigendetectionusingbronchialwashandbronchoalveolarlavageinpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT gilliambrucel galactomannanantigendetectionusingbronchialwashandbronchoalveolarlavageinpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT ryscavagepatricka galactomannanantigendetectionusingbronchialwashandbronchoalveolarlavageinpatientswithhematologicmalignancies