Cargando…

PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic macular holes are an important cause of blindness. They have an annual incidence of 8 per 100,000 individuals, and prevalence of 0.2 to 3.3 per 1000 individuals with visual impairment. The condition occurs more frequently in adults aged 75 years or older. Macular holes can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasu, Saruban, Bunce, Catey, Hooper, Richard, Thomson, Ann, Bainbridge, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1048-8
_version_ 1782401586326142976
author Pasu, Saruban
Bunce, Catey
Hooper, Richard
Thomson, Ann
Bainbridge, James
author_facet Pasu, Saruban
Bunce, Catey
Hooper, Richard
Thomson, Ann
Bainbridge, James
author_sort Pasu, Saruban
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Idiopathic macular holes are an important cause of blindness. They have an annual incidence of 8 per 100,000 individuals, and prevalence of 0.2 to 3.3 per 1000 individuals with visual impairment. The condition occurs more frequently in adults aged 75 years or older. Macular holes can be repaired by surgery in which the causative tractional forces in the eye are released and a temporary bubble of gas is injected. To promote successful hole closure individuals may be advised to maintain a face-down position for up to 10 days following surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether advice to position face-down improves the surgical success rate of closure of large (>400 μm) macular holes, and thereby reduces the need for further surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a multicentre interventional, comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning with face-forward positioning. At the conclusion of standardised surgery across all sites, participants still eligible for inclusion will be allocated randomly 1:1 to 1 of the 2 treatment arms stratified by site, using random permuted blocks of size 4 or 6 in equal proportions. We will recruit 192 participants having surgery for large macular holes (>400 μm); 96 in each of the 2 arms of the study. The primary objective is to determine the impact of face-down positioning on the likelihood of closure of large (≥400 μm) full-thickness macular holes following surgery. DISCUSSION: This will be the first multicentre randomised control trial to investigate the value of face-down positioning following macular hole standardised surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UK CRN: 17966 (date of registration 26 November 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1048-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4650938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46509382015-11-19 PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Pasu, Saruban Bunce, Catey Hooper, Richard Thomson, Ann Bainbridge, James Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Idiopathic macular holes are an important cause of blindness. They have an annual incidence of 8 per 100,000 individuals, and prevalence of 0.2 to 3.3 per 1000 individuals with visual impairment. The condition occurs more frequently in adults aged 75 years or older. Macular holes can be repaired by surgery in which the causative tractional forces in the eye are released and a temporary bubble of gas is injected. To promote successful hole closure individuals may be advised to maintain a face-down position for up to 10 days following surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether advice to position face-down improves the surgical success rate of closure of large (>400 μm) macular holes, and thereby reduces the need for further surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a multicentre interventional, comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning with face-forward positioning. At the conclusion of standardised surgery across all sites, participants still eligible for inclusion will be allocated randomly 1:1 to 1 of the 2 treatment arms stratified by site, using random permuted blocks of size 4 or 6 in equal proportions. We will recruit 192 participants having surgery for large macular holes (>400 μm); 96 in each of the 2 arms of the study. The primary objective is to determine the impact of face-down positioning on the likelihood of closure of large (≥400 μm) full-thickness macular holes following surgery. DISCUSSION: This will be the first multicentre randomised control trial to investigate the value of face-down positioning following macular hole standardised surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UK CRN: 17966 (date of registration 26 November 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1048-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4650938/ /pubmed/26576755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1048-8 Text en © Pasu et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pasu, Saruban
Bunce, Catey
Hooper, Richard
Thomson, Ann
Bainbridge, James
PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort pims (positioning in macular hole surgery) trial – a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1048-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pasusaruban pimspositioninginmacularholesurgerytrialamulticentreinterventionalcomparativerandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingfacedownpositioningwithaninactivefaceforwardpositionontheoutcomeofsurgeryforlargemacularholesstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buncecatey pimspositioninginmacularholesurgerytrialamulticentreinterventionalcomparativerandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingfacedownpositioningwithaninactivefaceforwardpositionontheoutcomeofsurgeryforlargemacularholesstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hooperrichard pimspositioninginmacularholesurgerytrialamulticentreinterventionalcomparativerandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingfacedownpositioningwithaninactivefaceforwardpositionontheoutcomeofsurgeryforlargemacularholesstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomsonann pimspositioninginmacularholesurgerytrialamulticentreinterventionalcomparativerandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingfacedownpositioningwithaninactivefaceforwardpositionontheoutcomeofsurgeryforlargemacularholesstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bainbridgejames pimspositioninginmacularholesurgerytrialamulticentreinterventionalcomparativerandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingfacedownpositioningwithaninactivefaceforwardpositionontheoutcomeofsurgeryforlargemacularholesstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial