Cargando…
Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film
Objective: To compare the coefficient of friction (CoF) of skin against fabric when the skin is covered with a liquid barrier film versus a silicone dressing, relative to a bare skin baseline. Approach: A laboratory instrument allowing the measurement of friction between two surfaces was used to com...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26634182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0628 |
_version_ | 1782401599201607680 |
---|---|
author | Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. Mengistu, Golie E. Ekholm, Bruce P. Sanghi, Shilpi Theiss, Steven D. |
author_facet | Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. Mengistu, Golie E. Ekholm, Bruce P. Sanghi, Shilpi Theiss, Steven D. |
author_sort | Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare the coefficient of friction (CoF) of skin against fabric when the skin is covered with a liquid barrier film versus a silicone dressing, relative to a bare skin baseline. Approach: A laboratory instrument allowing the measurement of friction between two surfaces was used to compare the CoF between a fabric representing bed linen (100% cotton) and the skin of two laboratory operators, either bare (dry or hydrated) or covered with a liquid barrier film or a silicone dressing. Results: The CoF of hydrated skin was over twice the value found for dry skin. The liquid barrier film product reduced the CoF of hydrated skin to a greater extent than the silicone dressing. Innovation and Conclusion: Silicone dressings have recently been promoted to help prevent pressure ulcers. Published data have shown that their CoF is lower than other dressings, but the data were not compared to bare skin. We found that a liquid barrier film provided a greater reduction in the CoF of skin against linen than a silicone dressing. In the context of preventative use (e.g., application on intact skin) to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers, applying a liquid barrier film may reduce friction better than a silicone dressing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4651030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46510302015-12-02 Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. Mengistu, Golie E. Ekholm, Bruce P. Sanghi, Shilpi Theiss, Steven D. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Discovery Express Objective: To compare the coefficient of friction (CoF) of skin against fabric when the skin is covered with a liquid barrier film versus a silicone dressing, relative to a bare skin baseline. Approach: A laboratory instrument allowing the measurement of friction between two surfaces was used to compare the CoF between a fabric representing bed linen (100% cotton) and the skin of two laboratory operators, either bare (dry or hydrated) or covered with a liquid barrier film or a silicone dressing. Results: The CoF of hydrated skin was over twice the value found for dry skin. The liquid barrier film product reduced the CoF of hydrated skin to a greater extent than the silicone dressing. Innovation and Conclusion: Silicone dressings have recently been promoted to help prevent pressure ulcers. Published data have shown that their CoF is lower than other dressings, but the data were not compared to bare skin. We found that a liquid barrier film provided a greater reduction in the CoF of skin against linen than a silicone dressing. In the context of preventative use (e.g., application on intact skin) to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers, applying a liquid barrier film may reduce friction better than a silicone dressing. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4651030/ /pubmed/26634182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0628 Text en © Stéphanie F. Bernatchez, et al. 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Discovery Express Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. Mengistu, Golie E. Ekholm, Bruce P. Sanghi, Shilpi Theiss, Steven D. Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title | Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title_full | Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title_fullStr | Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title_short | Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M(™) Cavilon(™) No Sting Barrier Film |
title_sort | reducing friction on skin at risk: the use of 3m(™) cavilon(™) no sting barrier film |
topic | Discovery Express |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26634182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernatchezstephanief reducingfrictiononskinatrisktheuseof3mcavilonnostingbarrierfilm AT mengistugoliee reducingfrictiononskinatrisktheuseof3mcavilonnostingbarrierfilm AT ekholmbrucep reducingfrictiononskinatrisktheuseof3mcavilonnostingbarrierfilm AT sanghishilpi reducingfrictiononskinatrisktheuseof3mcavilonnostingbarrierfilm AT theissstevend reducingfrictiononskinatrisktheuseof3mcavilonnostingbarrierfilm |