Cargando…

Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC

BACKGROUND: We derived estimates of overdiagnosis by polygenic risk groups and examined whether polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer reduces overdiagnosis. METHODS: We calculated the polygenic risk score based on genotypes of 66 known prostate cancer loci for 4967 men from the Fin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pashayan, Nora, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schleutker, Johanna, Talala, Kirsi, Tammela, Teuvo LJ, Määttänen, Liisa, Harrington, Patricia, Tyrer, Jonathan, Eeles, Rosalind, Duffy, Stephen W, Auvinen, Anssi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26291059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.289
_version_ 1782401606667468800
author Pashayan, Nora
Pharoah, Paul DP
Schleutker, Johanna
Talala, Kirsi
Tammela, Teuvo LJ
Määttänen, Liisa
Harrington, Patricia
Tyrer, Jonathan
Eeles, Rosalind
Duffy, Stephen W
Auvinen, Anssi
author_facet Pashayan, Nora
Pharoah, Paul DP
Schleutker, Johanna
Talala, Kirsi
Tammela, Teuvo LJ
Määttänen, Liisa
Harrington, Patricia
Tyrer, Jonathan
Eeles, Rosalind
Duffy, Stephen W
Auvinen, Anssi
author_sort Pashayan, Nora
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We derived estimates of overdiagnosis by polygenic risk groups and examined whether polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer reduces overdiagnosis. METHODS: We calculated the polygenic risk score based on genotypes of 66 known prostate cancer loci for 4967 men from the Finnish section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. We stratified the 72 072 men in the trial into those with polygenic risk below and above the median. Using a maximum likelihood method based on interval cancers, we estimated the mean sojourn time (MST) and episode sensitivity. For each polygenic risk group, we estimated the proportion of screen-detected cancers that are likely to be overdiagnosed from the difference between the observed and expected number of screen-detected cancers. RESULTS: Of the prostate cancers, 74% occurred among men with polygenic risk above population median. The sensitivity was 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.65) and MST 6.3 (95% CI 4.2–8.3) years. The overall overdiagnosis was 42% (95% CI 37–52) of the screen-detected cancers, with 58% (95% CI 54–65) in men with the lower and 37% (95% CI 31–47) in those with higher polygenic risk. CONCLUSION: Targeting screening to men at higher polygenic risk could reduce the proportion of cancers overdiagnosed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4651137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46511372015-12-03 Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC Pashayan, Nora Pharoah, Paul DP Schleutker, Johanna Talala, Kirsi Tammela, Teuvo LJ Määttänen, Liisa Harrington, Patricia Tyrer, Jonathan Eeles, Rosalind Duffy, Stephen W Auvinen, Anssi Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: We derived estimates of overdiagnosis by polygenic risk groups and examined whether polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer reduces overdiagnosis. METHODS: We calculated the polygenic risk score based on genotypes of 66 known prostate cancer loci for 4967 men from the Finnish section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. We stratified the 72 072 men in the trial into those with polygenic risk below and above the median. Using a maximum likelihood method based on interval cancers, we estimated the mean sojourn time (MST) and episode sensitivity. For each polygenic risk group, we estimated the proportion of screen-detected cancers that are likely to be overdiagnosed from the difference between the observed and expected number of screen-detected cancers. RESULTS: Of the prostate cancers, 74% occurred among men with polygenic risk above population median. The sensitivity was 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.65) and MST 6.3 (95% CI 4.2–8.3) years. The overall overdiagnosis was 42% (95% CI 37–52) of the screen-detected cancers, with 58% (95% CI 54–65) in men with the lower and 37% (95% CI 31–47) in those with higher polygenic risk. CONCLUSION: Targeting screening to men at higher polygenic risk could reduce the proportion of cancers overdiagnosed. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-29 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4651137/ /pubmed/26291059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.289 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Pashayan, Nora
Pharoah, Paul DP
Schleutker, Johanna
Talala, Kirsi
Tammela, Teuvo LJ
Määttänen, Liisa
Harrington, Patricia
Tyrer, Jonathan
Eeles, Rosalind
Duffy, Stephen W
Auvinen, Anssi
Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title_full Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title_fullStr Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title_full_unstemmed Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title_short Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC
title_sort reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the finnish section of the erspc
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26291059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.289
work_keys_str_mv AT pashayannora reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT pharoahpauldp reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT schleutkerjohanna reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT talalakirsi reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT tammelateuvolj reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT maattanenliisa reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT harringtonpatricia reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT tyrerjonathan reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT eelesrosalind reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT duffystephenw reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc
AT auvinenanssi reducingoverdiagnosisbypolygenicriskstratifiedscreeningfindingsfromthefinnishsectionoftheerspc